"... the willingness to live up to the spirit of a new era must neither fragment nor soften the fundament of Western culture...". Pastoral practice between pre-conciliar modernity and post-conciliar conservativism

梵蒂冈二世之前的天主教绝不像人们回想起来的那样，是一个统一和孤立的实体。甚至在第二届梵蒂冈理事会之前，牧师们偶尔就有勇气在他们的教区实施改革派的想法。然而，在安理会之后，一些这样的以前的“现代”牧师经历了他们的信念的分裂：他们不仅拒绝安理会的部分决议，而且他们还从根本上禁止他们以前的所有现代化努力从他们的牧民实践中。这些牧师的双重非同时性，一方面是20世纪40年代和50年代盛行的教会保守主义中间的先驱，另一方面是在高度创新的时代采取保守行动的人，必须分析和解释。因此，该分项目将审查德意志联邦共和国和解前和和解后天主教在牧民工作领域的多样性问题。斯图加特市牧师赫尔曼·布鲁查(1902-1972)被选为一个可能的案例研究。布鲁查属于一群牧师，在和解前的时代，他们故意超越统治保守主义的界限，就他们的牧民活动而言。在20世纪60年代后半期，他表现出了明显的转机。这位现代牧师成为了一名行事保守的牧师。这个子项目试图通过考虑牧民实践、变化的语义和情感动态的角度，准确地检查这些冲突领域，这些领域意味着对天主教徒的多样化理解。三个分析维度被考虑在内：活跃性和社会性(教区)、经验和宗教自取(礼仪)以及接纳和界定/渗透(媒体工作/普世)。这一主题将在两个子项目中审查，这两个子项目侧重于牧民实践的不同行动领域：第一个子项目探讨牧师在其内部职能中作为“天主教环境管理者”的作用，第二个子项目则将他视为他的传教士维度和外部。这两个项目都遵循了一个三个阶段的进程，该进程基于对未发表的来源的分析，并辅之以Breucha的广泛公众，这一点已在印刷媒体中得到反映。为了对比这些发现，将组织对布鲁查同时代人的采访。在该项目的未来阶段，对另一位“改革者”(奥托·卡雷尔饰)的比较分析可能有助于找出导致不同方向决定的身份标志。通过调查布鲁查的当前环境以及年轻一代对他的接待，该项目将进一步深入了解后和解阶段“成为天主教徒”的含义。因此，在长达30多年的时间里，人们可以在不同含义的“回声空间”中研究天主教徒的不同变体，在这段时间里，发生了深刻的剧变。

The catholicism before Vatican II was by no means as uniform and isolated an entity as it was often perceived in retrospect. Even before the Second Vatican Council, pastors occasionally had had the courage to implement reformist ideas in their parishes. In the aftermath of the Council, however, some of such formerly "modern" pastors experienced a fracture with their convictions: Not only did they reject parts of the Council’s resolutions, but they also radically banned all of their previous efforts of modernisation from their pastoral practice. The double non-simultaneity of these pastors, who, on the one hand acted as pioneers in the middle of the church conservatism that prevailed in the 1940s and 50s, and who, on the other hand undertook a conservative move in a time of high innovation, must be analyzed and explained. Therefore, the subproject will review the diversity thesis of both pre- and post-conciliar Catholicism in the Federal Republic of Germany in the field of pastoral work. The Stuttgart city pastor Hermann Breucha (1902-1972) was selected as a a possible case study. Breucha belonged to a group of pastors who, in pre-conciliar times, deliberately exceeded the boundaries of the ruling conservatism as far as their pastoral activities were. In the second half of the 1960s, he then showed a clear turnaround. The modern pastor became a conservativly acting clergyman. The subproject seeks to examine precisely these fields of conflict, which imply a diversified understanding of being Catholic, by considering the perspectives of pastoral practice, changed semantics, and emotional dynamics. Three analytical dimensions are taken into account: activation and sociality (parish), experience and religious self-appropriation (liturgy) as well as admission and demarcation/permeability (media work/ecumenism).The topic will be examined in two subprojects, which focus on various fields of action of pastoral practice: The first explores the pastor as "manager of the Catholic milieu" in his function ad intra, the second then considers him in his missionary dimension ad extra. Both projects follow a three-stage process that is based on the analysis of unpublished sources, complemented by Breucha's extended public, which has been reflected in print media. To contrast the findings, interviews with Breucha’s contemporaries will be organized. In a future phase of the project, a comparative analysis of another "reformer" (Otto Karrer), who, however, pursued the opposite way to Breucha, may help to work out identity markers that lead to the different directional decisions. By investigating Breucha’s reception by his immediate environment as well by the younger generation, the project will gain further insights in what "being Catholic" meant in the post-conciliar phase. Thus, variants of being Catholic can be studied in differently connoted "echo spaces" over the prolonged period of a little more than 30 years during which a deep upheaval took place.