权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Some Aspects of the Cross-Cultural Trades and Regional Differences in East Asia.

东亚跨文化贸易和区域差异的某些方面。

基本信息

批准号：
61450050
负责人：
ODANI Nakao
金额：
$ 2.11万
依托单位：
Toyama University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1986
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1986 至 1987
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

(1) I have ever suggested a historical law on the cross-cultural trades between East and West: they have exchanged special goods and know-hows each other over the long run of time, but they have been wise enough to avoid or reduce the social change caused by external stimulation, substituting something proper for anything alien, if possigle. As a general rule they have supplied each other's need only.Among Chinese historians as well as Japanese scholars of Chinese history, Most are inclined to make little of foreign influence on Chinese historical development, because they are too much confident of the greatness and uniqueness of Chinese civilization: that is a China-centered view of history. My opinion is some different: through time, the cross-cultural trades have been the most source of change and development in art, science and technology. Ching was no execption in the world history.(2) Jitsuzo Kuzabara published an article " The contrast between North and South in Chinese History " in 1915. He asid, " Chinese history, so to speak, is a history of the southern expansion of the great culture of Han people " . He nearly evidences of regional cultures in prehistoric China and their cross-cultural trades, in turn developing each culture, which have survived through historical age. At present, J. Kuwabara's opinion might be too nuch mono-centric view to understand Chinese history as it was.

(1)我曾经提出过一个关于东西方跨文化贸易的历史规律：它们在长期的时间里相互交换了特殊的商品和技术，但它们足够明智地避免或减少了由外部刺激引起的社会变化，如果可能的话，用合适的东西代替任何外来的东西。一般说来，他们只是互相补充对方的需要。在中国历史学家和日本研究中国历史的学者中，大多数人都倾向于忽视外国对中国历史发展的影响，因为他们对中华文明的伟大和独特性过于自信：这是一种以中国为中心的历史观。我的看法有些不同：长期以来，跨文化贸易一直是艺术、科学和技术变化和发展的最主要来源。清朝在世界历史上也是一个例外。(2)1915年，久原实三发表了《中国历史上的南北对比》一文。他说：“中国的历史，可以说是一部伟大的汉民族文化南迁的历史。”他几乎是史前中国区域文化及其跨文化贸易的证据，反过来又发展了每一种文化，这些文化在历史时代幸存下来。目前看来，桑原慎太郎的观点可能过于单一中心主义，不能如实地理解中国历史。