ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL NORMS-EVOLUTION AND TRANSFORMATION

这个项目的目的是分析全球化市场经济中新的体制规范的演变，其中产生、传递和交换信息的机制正在迅速变化。分析的理论框架是新近发展起来的非结果主义社会选择理论和一般均衡理论。它最初是一桥大学和法国EHESS的国际合作研究，这一特点贯穿了整个项目，双方的几位参与者有机会访问对方国家，进行积极的联合研究。通过这些互动研究活动产生的成果有以下几个典型的结果，所有这些结果要么已经出现在专业学术期刊上，要么计划在不久的将来出现我们发展了一种非福利主义的，有时是无后果主义的规范经济学，它不仅是新颖的，而且有助于产生新的见解……在社会和个人选择的背景下，特别是在阿罗维不可能定理的背景下，有更实际的见解我们成功地开发了一个新的数学框架，使我们能够分析涉及随机转移的交易网络的最优性（竞争力）我们成功地分析了资源配置理论中公平原则和效率原则相结合的词典编纂方法。这与传统的规范经济学截然不同，在传统经济学中，这两个原则在“公平-效率权衡”的名义下被认为是相互矛盾的。除了这些已发表或即将发表的研究文章外，我们正在撰写一本关于阿马蒂亚·森（Amartya Sen）经济学和伦理学的书。这是第一本从学术深度分析森对经济学和伦理学的贡献的书。此外，在个人选择理论和社会选择理论方面，也有许多与非结果主义及其含义有关的理论。少

This project was designed to analyze the evolution of a new institutional norms in the globalized market economy, where the mechanism of generating, transmitting and exchanging information is rapidly changing. The theoretical framework of analysis is a newly evolving non-consequentialist social choice theory and general equilibrium theory. It started as an international collaborative research between Hitotsubashi University and EHESS in France, and this feature persisted throughout the whole project, Several participants from both ends had an opportunity to visit the counterpart country and pursue vigorous joint reasearch. What are produced through these interactive research activities are typified by the following results, all of which either already appeared in the professional academic journals or are scheduled to appear in the near future.1 We developed a non-welfaristic and sometimes no-consequrentialist normative economics, which are not only novel, but also conducive to new theo … More retical insights in the context of social and individual choice in general, and of the Arrovian impossibility theorems in particular.2 We succeeded in developing a new mathematical framework which enabled us to analyze the optimality (competitiveness) of transaction networks involving stochastic transfers.3 We analysed successfully the methods of lexicographically combining two principles in resource allocation theory, viz., the equity principle and the efficiency principle. This is a sharp departure from the traditional normative economics, where these two principles have been deemed contradictory under the name of "equity-efficiency trade-off."In addition to these published or forthcoming research articles, we are in the final stage of a book on Amartya Sen's economics and ethics. This is the first book which analyses Sen's contribution to economics and ethics in academic depth. Furthermore, there are many DPs on individual and social choice theory, which are also concerned with the non-consequentialism and its implications. Less