权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Study of Japanese and Korean Economy-Industry and Company-

日韩经济比较研究-产业与企业-

基本信息

批准号：
10045012
负责人：
AKAOKA Isao
金额：
$ 1.54万
依托单位：
KYOTO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B).
财政年份：
1998
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1998 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This seminar was held several year after the start of the Asian Economic Crisis, and was able to gather observations from various angles on the characteristics of the crisis. Regarding MIT Professor Paul Krugman's much-noticed article "Myth of Asia's Miracle" (Foreign Affairs, Nov.1994), a neoclassical analysis on the division of functions between government and market was presented. From the standpoint of quantitative analysis, analysis based on a consolidated capital economic model was presented, stating that root cause of South Korea's economic crisis was the decline of the currency, which in turn was caused by structural trade deficit. (A debate occurred when simulation of future capital outflow was presented.) An analysis of the actions of SouthKorean media, academia and government, as well as the actions of United States and the IMF as the crisis unfolded was presented, as was a comparison of the crisis with crises in Latin America and Southeast Asia.Many provocative findings on … More Japanese and South Korean economies and businesses-areas experiencing rapid change in the light of the collapse of the two countries' financial policies-were presented. There was debate on whether to interpret such crises as the disintegration of the two countries' economic frameworks or to interpret such crises as transitions to new economic frameworks. There was marked difference in opinion between Japanese and South Korean researchers on just how much cooperation would be possible between Japanese and South Korean industrial structures. And, an opinion was heard that called for South Korea to formulate policy that would emulate in South Korea the success of Japan's small businesses-often cited as a strong point of the Japanese economy-and their advancement into Asia. Regarding changes in employment practices in Japan and South Korea (developments of wide concern for both countries), there was a presentation as well as a debate which showed well the effectiveness of comparative analysis. There also was a presentation on the inner workings of the dismantlement of Japanese employment practices as well as an explanation of the Japanese tendency for worker shortage. A question wasasked querying what policies the rise of the the labor movement in South Korea since the latter half of the 1980s will bring forth in the light of the current economic crisis. There also was debate on what the advancement of employment practices would consist of as international competition intensifies.Many researchers presented opinions stating that an important topic for the immediate future is reform in East Asia economic structure that would cover not just Japan and South Korea but also China, where open-door policies are being enacted. Also, opinions were heard that stated IMF's plans for structural reform should be contrasted by actively proposing alternate plans based on conditions in Asian countries. And, numerous clearly defined ideas (including many policy proposals) in fields of finance, labor, technology, corporate practices, etc. were presented, followed by debates among researchers. Less

这次研讨会是在亚洲经济危机爆发几年后举行的，能够从各种角度收集关于危机特征的意见。关于麻省理工学院教授保罗·克鲁格曼（Paul Krugman）的著名文章《亚洲奇迹的神话》（Foreign Affairs，1994年11月），对政府与市场的职能分工进行了新古典主义的分析。从定量分析的观点出发，根据统一资本经济模型进行了分析，指出韩国经济危机的根本原因是货币贬值，而货币贬值又是由结构性贸易赤字造成的。（在模拟未来资本外流时发生了争论。报告分析了韩国媒体、学术界和政府的行动，以及美国和国际货币基金组织在危机发生时的行动，并将危机与拉丁美洲和东南亚的危机进行了比较。 ...更多信息日本和韩国的经济和商业--由于两国金融政策的崩溃而经历迅速变化的领域--被介绍了出来。对于是将这种危机解释为两国经济框架的解体，还是将这种危机解释为向新经济框架的过渡，存在着辩论。日本和韩国的研究人员对日本和韩国的产业结构之间究竟有多少合作可能存在明显的意见分歧。此外，还有一种意见认为，韩国应该制定政策，效仿日本小企业的成功（通常被认为是日本经济的优势），并向亚洲进军。关于日本和韩国的雇用做法的变化（两国都广泛关注的事态发展），进行了介绍和辩论，充分显示了比较分析的有效性。此外，还介绍了日本雇用做法的内部运作，并解释了日本工人短缺的趋势。有记者问到，在当前的经济危机下，韩国自20世纪80年代后半期以来兴起的劳工运动将带来什么政策。此外，随着国际竞争的加剧，如何推进就业实践也成为争论的焦点。许多研究者提出，不仅是日本和韩国，还包括正在实行开放政策的中国在内的东亚经济结构的改革，是近期的重要课题。还有人认为，应根据亚洲国家的情况，积极提出替代计划，以对照货币基金组织的结构改革计划。此外，在金融、劳动、技术、企业实践等领域提出了许多明确的想法（包括许多政策建议），随后在研究人员之间进行了辩论。少