权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Creole of Culture and the Structuration of Law---the Exploration and Furtherance of "Comparative Legal Formation"---

文化的克里奥尔语与法律的建构——“比较法律构成”的探索与推进——

基本信息

批准号：
14320001
负责人：
AIZAWA Hisashi
金额：
$ 6.4万
依托单位：
Hokkaido University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this research project, we tried at the first stage to search various significant materials in order to make relevant focuses on the research points for each member ; then at the second stage we tried to analyze the multi-level workings of the process of the creole of cultures and the structuration of law (We distinguished the dimensions of value, society, and institutional histories, and further did for the last dimension the Asian context, the European context, the American context, and the Japanese context.) ; and at the final stage we tried to integrate those various explorations by each member in a comprehensive scheme.As to the dimension of value, we explicated the role of connected critic in society and its role for the process of the permeation of values, concerning the transference of values and the change of the constitutional structure of society. As to the dimension of society, we explicated the factors for the disturbing gap between legal ideas in the state and social culture, with focusing on the paradoxical process of self-absorption in the popular protest against the dominance of the "empire". As to the dimension of institutional histories, we firstly explicated for Asia the possibility of the connection between two types of legal cultures, one the culture of gradation and the other culture of discontinuity, especially through the Chinese experience ; secondly explicated for Europe the vital interests of the noble class in the process of the establishment of the Carolina Criminal Code in the 15th century Germany ; thirdly explicated for the US the significance of the consensus on the rule of law and liberty rights in the multi-religious conflict situation today ; and finally explicated for Japan the process of the interpretive adaptation of the Chinese legal system by the noble poet-lawyers in the 6th century Heian period.

在本研究计画中，我们在第一阶段尝试搜寻各种有意义的资料，以便针对每个成员的研究重点做相关的聚焦;然后在第二阶段，我们试图分析克里奥尔文化和法律结构化过程的多层次运作（我们区分了价值、社会和制度历史的维度，并进一步为最后一个维度做了亚洲背景、欧洲背景、美国背景，日本的背景）。在价值维度上，我们从价值的转移和社会结构的变化两个方面，阐述了关联批评者在社会中的作用及其对价值渗透过程的作用。在社会维度上，我们分析了国家法律的观念与社会文化之间令人不安的鸿沟的原因，并着重分析了民众对“帝国”统治的抗议中自我关注的矛盾过程。在制度史的维度上，我们首先通过中国的经验，为亚洲阐明了等级文化和间断文化两种法律的文化之间的联系的可能性，其次为欧洲阐明了世纪德国在卡罗莱纳刑法典制定过程中贵族阶层的切身利益;第三，为美国阐明了在当今多宗教冲突的形势下，法治与自由权利的共识的意义;第四，为日本阐明了世纪平安时代的贵族律师诗人对中国法律的制度的解释适应过程。