权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Kommunal waste management and local public management in Japan and Germany

日本和德国的公共废物管理和地方公共管理

基本信息

批准号：
14330015
负责人：
ONO Takahiro
金额：
$ 9.09万
依托单位：
Nagasaki University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14330015/
关键词：
local public management waste fee system benchmarking liberalisation privatisation public private partnership cost accounting municipal waste managemnet public services

项目摘要

The main purpose of this study is to throw light on the structural change of traditional leadership of self-governing body's public waste disposal after institutinalisation of "circulated social system", specially based on the comparative survey of case studies in Germany and Japan. This reseach is composed of the following 3 sub-themes forcussmg on the local public management.1.The financing system of waste management in municiparity.In order to compare characteristics between fee system in Germany and tax system in Japan, we analysed impact of changes on waste volumes and waste fee by recycling, and merit and demerit of eash financing systems compared with the other public services. After mat policy's effect and prospects or the waste disposal fee's als economical instrument or als financial ones are surveyed in each kontext of Germany and Japan.2.The organisationforms and privatisation/liberalisation of kommunal waste management.the organization forms of municipal waste management i … More n Germany is very diversified by impact of privatisation of local waste management. In order to understand the transformation to the private sector, such as external consignment or PFI or PPP in Germany and Europe, two concepts of liberalisation are used, competition in-the-market and competition for-the-market Known as competitive tendering. And there are several models of liveralisation based on these two concedpts in Germany We analysed BDE-modell, SRU-Modell, Monopol-Kommission, BIfA-modell, and conclused by characterising of the waste services and cost-structure between waste collection and waste disposal.3.Benchmarking for komparative survey of kommunal waste management.In Germany benchmarking in public sectors are deveroped als the incentives on local governments to improve waste management efficiently, instead of kompetition in-the-market. We surveyed case studies of two types Benchmarking of INFA and BIfA in Hirakata-shi, Sasebo-shi and Fukuoka-shi. Now we start to introduce Benchmarking to another cities in Kanto, and we could develop the Japanese-Type or Benchmarking in locar waste management. Less

本研究的主要目的是通过对德国和日本案例的比较研究，揭示在“循环社会制度”制度化后，自治团体公共垃圾处理传统领导权的结构变化。本研究以地方公共管理为主题，分为以下三个部分：一、地方政府废弃物管理的融资制度：为了比较德国的收费制度和日本的税收制度的特点，我们分析了回收利用对废弃物量和废弃物收费的影响，以及与其他公共服务相比，地方政府废弃物管理融资制度的优缺点。本文首先分析了德国和日本的城市垃圾处理收费政策的效果和前景，以及垃圾处理收费的经济手段和财政手段。2.城市垃圾管理的组织形式和私有化/自由化 ...更多信息 n德国因当地废物管理私有化的影响而非常多样化。为了理解向私营部门的转变，例如德国和欧洲的外部委托或PFI或PPP，使用了两个自由化概念，即市场竞争和市场竞争，称为竞争性招标。在德国有几种基于这两种概念的肝化模型，我们分析了BDE模型、SRU模型、垄断委员会模型、BIfA模型，并通过废物服务和成本的特征得出结论-在德国，公共部门的基准制定是为了激励地方政府改善废物管理而不是在市场上竞争。我们调查了两种类型的基准INFA和BIfA在平片市，佐世保市和福冈市的案例研究。现在我们开始在关东地区的其他城市引进Benchmarking，我们可以在当地的废物管理中发展日本式或Benchmarking。少