权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Varieties of Cultural Selfassertion-Past and Present: With a Focus on Germany and East Asia

文化自我主张的多样性——过去与现在：以德国和东亚为中心

基本信息

批准号：
12410011
负责人：
MISHIMA Kenichi
金额：
$ 8.9万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This year has been the last of the project as a whole: The focus of our work was on the evaluation of the results of our recent research and on the debate on methodological subjects. Due to this reason the discussion on the assertions of cultural uniqueness (discourses on "Selbstbehauptung") in non-European world regions, especially in East Asia, went into various directions: What part did esthetics play in those discourses about national or cultural uniqueness? How did thoses discourses influence the history of sciences? What about the distinctive character of communitarism and its impact on the forms of life conduct?Furthermore, we took up another set of complex issues for debate, i.e. the strategies of instrumentalization concerning European philosophers; the theological reflexions as a design for selfassertion; the relationship between intellectual discourses on selfassertion and non-intellectual spheres of life, i.e. cloths, eating habits, living design etc.; the interchange of th … More e discourses on selfassertion in various countries of East Asia; the impact of travel literature.Taking the field of methodology into consideration, participants agreed that a critique of ideologies which often come together with discourses on cultural selfassertion are not sufficient for a proper understanding, although in thoses discourses Western concepts are used in order to defend the cultural uniqueness or to proof the cultural superiority of East Asia compared to the West. Instead, one has to reconsider the problem of "multiple modernities" which comes out off a careful investigation of those discourses: It will be a task of future research to analyze these problems in much more detail. This is important in so far as one could overcome the rather uninspiring contrast between cultural essentialism and constructivism. Furthermore we recognized that the paradigm of the "places of memory" could be a most stimulating approach for a deeper understanding of the discourses of cultural selfassertion. Less

今年是整个项目的最后一年：我们工作的重点是评估我们最近的研究结果以及关于方法论主题的辩论。由于这个原因，关于非欧洲世界地区，特别是东亚地区的文化独特性主张（关于“自我行为”的话语）的讨论走向了不同的方向：美学在这些关于民族或文化独特性的话语中扮演了什么角色？这些话语如何影响科学史？社群主义的独特性及其对生活行为方式的影响又如何呢？此外，我们还讨论了另一组复杂的争论问题，即欧洲哲学家的工具化策略；作为自我主张设计的神学反思；关于自我主张的知识分子话语与非知识生活领域（即服装、饮食习惯、生活设计等）之间的关系；东亚各国关于自我主张的对话的交流；考虑到方法论领域，与会者一致认为，对意识形态的批判常常与文化自我主张的话语结合在一起，不足以正确理解，尽管在这些话语中使用西方概念来捍卫文化的独特性或证明东亚相对于西方的文化优越性。相反，人们必须重新思考“多重现代性”的问题，这个问题是通过对这些话语的仔细考察而得出的：更详细地分析这些问题将是未来研究的任务。就我们能够克服文化本质主义和建构主义之间相当平淡的对比而言，这一点很重要。此外，我们认识到“记忆之地”的范式可能是更深入地理解文化自我主张话语的最刺激的方法。较少的