权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study on Multiple, Selective and Entangled Modernities

多重、选择性、纠缠的现代性研究

基本信息

批准号：
16320014
负责人：
MISHIMA Kenichi
金额：
$ 8.97万
依托单位：
Tokyo Keizai University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In recent years there is an increasing support for the thesis that the modernity and modernization must be thought in plurals, in other words, that what happened and is happening really must be recognized as multiple modernities. The conception of multiple modernities are shared especially by those theoreticians of modernity and modernization who are working in historical connection with the religious sociology of Max Weber and who are leading a critical dialogue with the modernization scheme of Jurgen Habermas. On the other way we are confronted with the provocative approach of some post-colonialists who are proclaiming the conception of entangled modernities. The emphasis lies on the assumed underlying direct connection between the colonial modernity and modernity of western metropolis. In addition to those two interpretations of modernity there is also a productive attempt of those sociologists stemming from the theoretical tradition of Elias to connect two approaches above mentioned with a comparative studies of civilization. From this point of view modernity shows not only in non-European regions, but also in Europe itself the striking variety and multiplicity. Along with it the civilization related view reveals modernity itself as a civilization on its own. This modern civilization entails so many contradictions and tensions as so many other civilizations. And this variety of contradictions and tensions in the modernity itself is an important factor in the encounter of non-western civilization with a expanding western modernity, a factor which has its expression in so many options which another civilizations underwent and so many institutional realization of modernity. In a series of workshops we could have with this research program we could exemplify this new paradigm by using many concrete studies on various countries and regions.

近年来，现代性和现代化必须被多元地思考，换言之，已经发生的和正在发生的事情必须被承认为多元的现代性，这一论点得到了越来越多的支持。多元现代性的概念尤其为那些研究现代性和现代化的理论家所共有，他们与马克斯·韦伯的宗教社会学有着历史的联系，并领导着与尤尔根·哈贝马斯的现代化方案的批判性对话。另一方面，我们面临着一些后殖民主义者的挑衅性做法，他们宣称纠缠的现代性概念。本文的重点在于考察殖民地现代性与西方大都会现代性之间潜在的直接联系。除了对现代性的两种解读之外，那些继承埃利亚斯理论传统的社会学家们还进行了富有成效的尝试，将上述两种方法与文明的比较研究联系起来。从这个观点来看，现代性不仅在非欧洲地区，而且在欧洲本身也表现出惊人的多样性和多样性。沿着而来的是文明关联观，它揭示了现代性本身就是一种文明。这一现代文明与其他许多文明一样，也包含着如此多的矛盾和紧张。现代性本身的这种矛盾和紧张是非西方文明与西方现代性相遇的一个重要因素，这一因素表现在其他文明所经历的许多选择和现代性的许多制度实现中。在一系列的研讨会上，我们可以与这个研究计划，我们可以通过使用许多具体的研究，对不同的国家和地区，这一新的范式。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（52）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

グローバル資本主義の多元的変容

全球资本主义的多元化转型

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
図書『模索する社会の諸相』
影响因子：
0
作者：
Toshiaki;Kimae;Kenichi Mishima;Diener und Herrscher;三島憲一;三島憲一;三島憲一;三島憲一;三島憲一;Kenichi Mishima;ヴォルフガング・シュヴェントカー;木前利秋;三島憲一;Kenichi Mishima;Wolfgang Schwentker;三島憲一;木前利秋;木前利秋
通讯作者：
木前利秋

Nietzsche als transkurtureller Akrobat im Lichte unserer Erfahrung der Kurturellen Hybriditat.

尼采将 Transkurtureller Akrobat im Lichte unserer Erfahrung der Kurturellen Hybriditat。