权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study of political and social history for popular protests in Western modern states

西方现代国家民众抗议的政治和社会史研究

基本信息

批准号：
12410101
负责人：
OKAZUMI Masahide
金额：
$ 9.22万
依托单位：
University of Kitakyushu
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This project aimed to analyze popular protests in western modern states from various perspectives. We discussed diverse popular protests and tried to review states and societies in 20^<th> century in this project.In precedent studies of political and social history, the process that made "free and equal individual" was the premise of "modernization" generally, and barriers to this process were attempted to describe in the unique context of state or society concerned. While these studies pointed out social paradox as by-products of "modernization", reviews of the premise itself might insufficient. This project tried to review the premise and rethink the meaning of "modernization". As papers in this report showed, the relationships between the making of modern order by governments and the elite and the sense of traditional norms in popular protests were not only conflict, but governments / the elite and the people made a mistake in estimate of their behavior each other and caused "errors of composition". As a result, situations that both had not expect sometimes occurred. In fact, power structures were variable of disturbance for popular world as this world was a variable for power structures. When "event" caused, national powers couldn't manage it one-sidedly with their own rationality. We kept this points, renewal of publicness through interaction between the national structure and the popular world, and attempted to analyze various facet of popular protests.

本项目旨在从多个角度分析西方现代国家的民众抗议。在<th>以往的政治史和社会史研究中，一般都把“自由平等的个人”的形成过程作为“现代化”的前提，并试图在国家或社会的独特语境中描述这一过程的障碍。虽然这些研究指出社会悖论是“现代化”的副产品，但对前提本身的审查可能是不够的。本课题试图重新审视“现代化”的前提和意义。正如这份报告中的论文所显示的那样，政府和精英对现代秩序的制定与民众抗议活动中的传统规范感之间的关系不仅是冲突，而且政府/精英和民众对彼此行为的估计也出现了错误，并造成了“合成错误”。结果，有时候会出现双方都没有预料到的情况。事实上，权力结构是流行世界的干扰变量，因为这个世界是权力结构的变量。当“事件”发生时，国家权力不能以其自身的理性片面地进行管理。我们坚持这一观点，通过国家结构和民众世界之间的互动来更新公共性，并试图分析民众抗议的各个方面。