权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Study on Lifelong Learning Policy Development

终身学习政策制定的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
13571013
负责人：
YAMADA Kanehisa
金额：
$ 3.9万
依托单位：
National Institute for Educational Policy Research of Japan (NIER)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13571013/
关键词：
lifelong learning policy international comparative studies international research exchange educational reform evaluation of learning outcome finance of lifelong learning 比較教育学多国籍生涯学習国際比較研究

项目摘要

The aim of this study was to find out model cases of method and process of policy making, which is effective for the promotion of lifelong learning, by making investigation on good practices in Europe and Asia-Pacific regions in cooperation with three institutions ; UNESCO International Institute of Educational Planning (IIEP), Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) and Australian National Center for Vocational Education Research Ltd (NCVER). During the teen of project, we held three international meetings for the review of research progress and discussion in Pans (March 2003), Tokyo (November 2003), and Seoul (June 2004), and conducted the followings:1)International Comparison of Current Situation and Issues of Lifelong Learning Policy Making : Eleven countries were selected as model cases of implementing lifelong learning policies; France, U.K., Sweden and Norway from Europe, and Japan, South Korea, China, Thailand, Malaysia, Australia and Mexico from … More Asia-Pacific region. We have made contact with specialists on lifelong learning in each country, by making use of network of UNESCO/IIEP, and made research on current situation of lifelong learning policy development.2)Analysis of the Policy Development Process of Each Country : Analysis was made on the process of lifelong learning policy making in each country focusing on policy goals, innovation of learning system, legal arrangement, financing, programs, policy evaluation and collaborative organizations.3)Identification of Effective Models for Promoting Lifelong Learning : From the above analysis, we have identified a) system of evaluating outcome of various learning (Australia, France, South Korea), b) system of financing lifelong learning (U.K., Sweden) and c) introduction of the concept of lifelong learning in order to reform whole education system (Norway, Thailand, Malaysia, China, Japan). Case studies were made to investigate the policy formation and mechanism of its implementation in each country, which are collected in the final report. Less

本研究的目的是通过与三个机构合作调查欧洲和亚太地区的良好做法，找出有效促进终身学习的决策方法和过程的典型案例;联合国教科文组织国际教育规划研究所（IIEP）韩国职业教育和培训研究所（KRIVET）和澳大利亚国家职业教育研究中心（NCVER）。在项目实施过程中，我们分别于2003年3月、2003年11月和2004年6月在韩国釜山、东京和首尔举行了三次国际研讨会，对研究进展进行了回顾和讨论，并进行了以下工作：1）终身学习政策制定现状和问题的国际比较：选择了11个国家作为实施终身学习政策的典型案例，法国、英国、来自欧洲的瑞典和挪威，以及来自日本、韩国、中国、泰国、马来西亚、澳大利亚和墨西哥的 ...更多信息亚太地区我们利用教科文组织/国际教育规划研究所的网络，与各国的终身学习专家进行了接触，并对终身学习政策制定的现状进行了研究。2）各国政策制定过程分析：分析了各国终身学习政策的制定过程，重点从政策目标、学习制度创新、法律的安排、资金筹措、项目设置、政策评估和合作组织。3）确定促进终身学习的有效模式：根据上述分析，我们确定了a）评估各种学习成果的系统（澳大利亚、法国、韩国），B）资助终身学习的系统（英国，（c）引入终身学习的概念，以改革整个教育制度（挪威、泰国、马来西亚、中国、日本）。进行了个案研究，以调查每个国家的政策形成和执行机制，这些研究结果将收集在最后报告中。少