Research on the criative process of Buchner's works

在我的论文《布赫纳在他的第一部戏剧《丹东之死》中的意识形态立场》中，我试图正确地确定这位德国革命剧作家在19世纪欧洲意识形态流动中的地位。到目前为止，双向选择在布克纳的研究中占主导地位：许多研究人员将他定义为唯物主义者和无神论者，认为他的信念应归功于法国百科全书学家，而其他研究人员则认为他是自卢梭以来理想主义传统的后生雅各宾。通过对布克纳的戏剧与卢梭、费希特的各种哲学作品以及霍尔巴赫、狄德罗和埃尔维修斯的比较研究，本文得出的结论是，这两种对立的思想路线在他的第一部戏剧中尤其是在他的第一部戏剧中是相互斗争的，但从未经历过胜利。这篇论文通过了德国布赫纳研究所的审查，并将出现在其年度的下一期《格奥尔格·布赫纳·雅布赫》上。正文研究…关于布克纳唯一的散文作品《伦茨》的更多研究，在德国得到了正式的调查，这些成就最近出现在马尔堡的乔治·布赫纳研究所出版的第五卷《布赫纳全集》中。但这一卷的文本研究还存在很多问题。不仅文本的某些部分被随意解读，而且法国精神病学对布赫纳的影响也被高估了，以至于这部小说被歪曲为对当代德国精神病学的批评性研究。我在最新一期的《子午线》上发表的题为《看穿实证主义的灌木丛--如何阅读马尔堡研究所出版的伦茨》的论文，批评了乔治·布赫纳学会的方法和意图。本文通过一位意大利布赫纳研究员的斡旋开始，供欧洲同事阅读。虽然很少有关于我的适当主题-布赫纳作品创作过程的研究-的参考，但对我参加2004年在美国举行的国际布赫纳研讨会非常有用。我在这次研讨会上读到的关于“日本文学和德国文献学中的布赫纳接受”的论文将发表在范德比尔特大学和布赫纳研究所出版的“2004年纳希维尔布赫纳国际研讨会”一书中。较少

In my paper entitled "Georg Buchner's ideological standpoint in his first drama Danton's Death" I tried to determine properly the position of this german revolutionary dramatist in ideological flows of 19th century Europe. So far two-way choice is dominant in Buchner research : Many researchers define him as materialist and atheist oweing his conviction to french encyclopedists, while other reseachers consider him a late-born jacobin of the idealistic tradition since Rousseau. Through comparative research between Buchner's dramas and various phiolosohic works by Rousseau and Fichte on the one hand and of Holbach, Diderot and Elvetius on the other, I came to the conclusion in this paper that these two opposing lines of thought were struggling with each other especially in his first drama, yet without ever experiencing triumph. This paper passed the review of the Georg Buchner Institution in Germany and will appear in the next number of its annual, "Georg Buchner Jahrbuch".The text resea … More rch on "Lenz", Buchners only prose piece, has been investigated full-dress in Germany and the accomplishments have lately appeared in the fifth volume of the complete works of Buchner published by the Georg Buchner Institution in Marburg. But there are lots of problems in the text research of this volume. Not only are some parts of the text arbitrarily read, but the influences of the french psychiatry on Buchner are also overestimated so that this novel is distorted as ciritical study on the contemporary german psychiatry. My paper titled "Seeing through the positivistic bush - how to read the "Lenz" published by the institution in Marburg" which came out in the latest issue of the "Meridian", the annuals of the Georg Buchner Society of Japan, criticized the method and intention of the Georg Buchner Institution. This paper beginning now through the good offices of an italian Buchner researcher, to be read by European colleagues.Though there is little reference to my proper subject "research on the creative process of Buchner's works", it was very useful for me to have participated in the International Buchner Symposium 2004 in the USA. The paper I have read on this symposium about "the Buchner reception in the literature and German philology in Japan" is to appear in the book "Georg Buchner International Symposium 2004 in Nashiville" published by Vanderbilt University and the Georg Buchner Institution. Less