权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Computer-assisted Quantitative Companion of the Editions of Chaucer's The Romaunt of the Rose

乔叟《玫瑰传奇》各个版本的计算机辅助定量伴侣

基本信息

批准号：
17520174
负责人：
JIMURA Akiyuki
金额：
$ 2.24万
依托单位：
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2005
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2005 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17520174/
关键词：
Chaucer The Romaunt of the Rose editions Benson's edition Robinson's edition Variorum edition textual comparison computer Variorum Edition版

项目摘要

What follows is an interim report of a comprehensive textual comparison of Chaucer's The Romaunt of the Roses. We have undertaken a comparison of the following editions: Benson's The Riverside Chaucer (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), F. N. Robinson's The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957), and A Variorum Edition of The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Vol.VII The Romaunt of the Rose(Norman: U of Oklahoma P, 1999))We compared the editions line by line, and then word by word within pairs of "the same" lines.In this study, we have made use of the same method as we did in our Canterbury Tales, Troilus and Criseyde and Dream Poetry projects. It has been first necessary for us to make the corresponding lines, taking one from each of the editions, after we have made Benson's edition the basis for comparison. We have left all punctuation marks intact as they appear in the original editions, because they may indicate the editors' different interpretations of Chaucer's syntax.In the present document, we have listed all the lines, which contain one or more different words and spellings including upper/lower case differences. The first line shows Benson's edition, the second line Robinson's, and the third line Variorum Edition. We have printed the complete line in Benson's edition, but only the words, which show differences in Robinson's, and Variorum Edition's. We are now preparing for "Word Form Correspondence Index," where we will make an alphabetically ordered word index to the sets of corresponding words. This index makes it possible to check every word set quickly and comprehensively. The present list comprises the basic material for a further quantitative and qualitative study of the differences in spelling and vocabulary among the four editions. We have tried to make a contribution to Chaucerian textual criticism by clarifying the textual similarities and differences among the editions.

以下是乔叟的《玫瑰传奇》文本比较的一份中期报告。我们对以下版本进行了比较：本森的《滨江乔叟》（波士顿：霍顿米夫林，1987年），F。N.罗宾逊的《乔叟作品集》（波士顿：霍顿米夫林，1957年），和一个集丛版的作品杰弗里乔叟，第七届罗马农特的玫瑰（诺曼：俄克拉荷马州的U P，1999））我们逐行比较版本，然后在成对的“相同”行内逐字比较。在这项研究中，我们使用了与我们在坎特伯雷故事中所做的相同的方法，Troilus和Criseyde和梦想诗歌项目。它一直是我们首先有必要作出相应的线，从每一个版本，我们已经取得了本森的版本比较的基础。我们保留了原始版本中所有的标点符号，因为它们可能表明编辑对乔叟语法的不同解释。在本文档中，我们列出了所有包含一个或多个不同单词和拼写（包括大小写差异）的行。第一行是本森的版本，第二行是罗宾逊的版本，第三行是集注版。我们在本森的版本中印刷了完整的行，但只有单词，这表明罗宾逊和集注版的差异。我们现在正在准备“词形对应索引”，在那里我们将为对应的词集制作一个按字母顺序排列的词索引。该索引使得快速、全面地检查每个词集成为可能。目前的清单包括基本材料，进一步定量和定性研究的差异，拼写和词汇之间的四个版本。我们试图通过澄清版本之间的文本异同，为乔叟的考据学做出贡献。