Participation and Egalitarianism – Discourses on Social Participation/Solidarity and Diversity/Equality since 1990 (SP 1: Participation and Egalitarianism)

参与和平等主义 â 自 1990 年以来关于社会参与/团结和多样性/平等的论述（SP 1：参与和平等主义）

• 批准号: 493579160
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Noah Bubenhofer
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Deutsches Seminar
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Units
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/493579160?language=en
• 关键词: Participation; Egalitarianism; Discourses; Social; Solidarity

Social debates concerning access to central resources for a self-determined life (money, rights, status, etc.) are constantly being conducted in public. They have not lost their explosive power to the present day, as shown, for example, by the recent debates under the keywords "rip-offs" [German: "Abzocker"] / "social fraud" [German: "Sozialbetrug"] and "#MeToo". Put simply, these debates are often linguistically conducted distribution struggles in which the private becomes political. They form the subject of the sub-project "Participation & Egalitarianism", which is divided into the two focal points "Participation - Discourses on Social Participation and Solidarity since 1990" and "Egalitarianism - Discourses on Diversity and Equality since 1990" in the two planned funding periods. The debates on participation and equality are - according to the basic hypothesis of the applicants - often based on the same values (e.g. justice, social cohesion and solidarity) and premises (e.g. the idea that access to central resources for a self-determined way of life is politically controllable); they gain their explosiveness from the subcutaneous change of these values and premises in recent years and decades. Sub-project 1 "Participation & Egalitarianism - Discourses on Social Participation and Solidarity as well as Diversity and Equality since 1990", in conjunction with the other sub-projects, contributes to a linguistic history of controversial discourses since 1990 (cf. framework application). In the first funding phase, it aims to describe and analyse discourses of solidarity and participation in the Federal Republic of Germany and Switzerland - two countries that can be understood as representatives of social market economies. This is achieved through a corpus linguistic discourse analysis, with which relevant patterns of language use are identified and classified in a data-driven manner and interpreted against the background of sociological theories. The central starting point is the culturalist assumption that collective values about social coexistence - the social bond - are constantly negotiated and that patterns of language use are indicators of these negotiations.

关于获得自决生活的核心资源(金钱、权利、地位等)的社会辩论一直在公共场合进行。它们至今仍未丧失其爆炸力，例如，最近在“敲诈勒索”[德语：“Abzocker”]/“社会欺诈”[德语：“Sozialbetrug”]和“#MeToo”等关键词下进行的辩论就表明了这一点。简而言之，这些辩论通常是语言上进行的分配斗争，其中私人变成了政治。它们构成了“参与与平等主义”分项目的主题，在两个计划的资助期内，分项目分为两个协调中心：“参与--1990年以来关于社会参与和团结的讨论”和“平等主义--关于1990年以来多样性和平等的讨论”。根据申请者的基本假设，关于参与和平等的辩论往往基于相同的价值观(例如正义、社会凝聚力和团结)和前提(例如，为自决的生活方式获得中央资源的想法是政治上可控的)；这些价值观和前提在最近几年和几十年里的皮下变化使辩论变得爆炸性。分项目1“参与与平等主义--1990年以来关于社会参与和团结以及多样性和平等的讨论”，与其他分项目一起，为自1990年以来有争议的讨论的语言史作出贡献(参看框架应用程序)。在第一个筹资阶段，它旨在描述和分析德意志联邦共和国和瑞士这两个可被理解为社会市场经济代表的国家关于团结和参与的论述。这是通过语料库语言语篇分析实现的，通过语料库语篇分析，以数据驱动的方式识别和分类相关的语言使用模式，并在社会学理论的背景下进行解释。中心出发点是文化主义者的假设，即关于社会共存的集体价值观--社会纽带--是不断谈判的，语言使用模式是这些谈判的指标。