Environmental justice in a multispecies city. Othering, governing and resistance of abject and protected animals

多物种城市中的环境正义。

• 批准号: 512513565
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Robert Pütz
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Institut für Humangeographie (IHG)
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/512513565?language=en
• 关键词: Environmental; justice; multispecies; city.; Othering

Climate change, urbanisation and other factors threaten the living conditions of species worldwide. In view of this, there are increasing calls for cities (and other hitherto exclusively human spaces) to be understood as "shared habitats" and for hitherto purely social-scientific concepts such as right to the city or environmental justice to be thought of as "more-than-human". The project takes this up and asks in a fundamental way how society-wildlife relations in the urban context can be taken into account by human geography. Accordingly, the three guiding questions are: 1) What are conceptually justifiable and empirically realisable starting points for the analysis of shared habitats in the urban context? 2) Can initial empirical findings be identified on the main factors influencing society-wildlife relations in urban space? 3) How can human-geographical concepts and methods of society-space analysis be transferred to society-animal relations and where are the limits? Three analytical categories are proposed for analysis: Othering asks how social discourses problematise wild urban animals. Governing asks how such attributions are reflected in concrete policies, and Resistance looks at the "resistances" of everyday practice - of the animals themselves, but especially of human-wildlife encounters - that challenge discourses and policies and produce new forms of knowledge concerning the city as a horny habitat. The viability of the categories is tested by applying them to two very contrasting "groups" of wild animals: Abject animals as the classic outside of urban society (pigeons, rats, invasive species) and protected animals, which are addressed in various ways as desirable co-inhabitants. The case study is Frankfurt am Main.

气候变化、城市化和其他因素威胁着世界各地物种的生存条件。鉴于此，越来越多的人呼吁将城市（和其他迄今为止完全属于人类的空间）理解为“共享的栖息地”，并呼吁将迄今为止纯粹的社会科学概念，如城市权或环境正义，视为“超越人类”。该项目接受了这一点，并以一种基本的方式询问人类地理学如何考虑城市背景下的社会与野生动物关系。因此，三个指导性问题是：1)在城市背景下分析共享栖息地，什么是概念上合理、经验上可实现的起点？2)能否初步确定影响城市空间社会-野生动物关系的主要因素？3)人类地理学的社会空间分析概念和方法如何转移到社会-动物关系中？界限在哪里？本文提出了三个分析类别：另一个问题是社会话语如何使城市野生动物成为问题。《治理》问这些属性如何反映在具体的政策中，而《抵抗》则关注日常实践的“抵抗”——动物本身，尤其是人类与野生动物的相遇——挑战话语和政策，并产生关于城市作为角质栖息地的新形式的知识。通过将这些分类应用于两个截然不同的野生动物“群体”来测试它们的可行性：作为城市社会之外的典型的可怜的动物（鸽子、老鼠、入侵物种）和受保护的动物，它们以各种方式被视为理想的共同居民。案例研究是美因河畔法兰克福。