权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Geographical Ditribution and Cluster Analysis of The Cultures of Southeast Asia and Oceania.

东南亚和大洋洲文化的地理分布与聚类分析。

基本信息

批准号：
61301038
负责人：
OBAYASHI Taryo
金额：
$ 4.03万
依托单位：
The University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)
财政年份：
1986
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1986 至 1987
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Classification of the cultures of Southeast Asia and Oceania has been attempted over and over again by anthropologists with varying orientations, most of which have been intuitive ones. But they were regionally limited and covered only a certain field of cultures such as material culture, or social organization.We tried to classify the cultures of Southeast Asia and Oceania in its entirety, using statistical procedures, and covering all the major fields of cultures.We have quite intelligible tree-diagram of 150 ethnic units of Southeast Asia and Oceania, which was produced by cluster analysis on the degrees of sharing of 100 cultures traits by these peoples.Cultures of Southeat Asia and Oceania fall into two macro-groups:I Southeast Asian, and II Oceanic.I Southeast Asian macro-group consists of two groups: I-A Indochina-Nuclear Insular, and I-B Assam-Marginal Insular. I-A Indochina-Nuclear Insular group is divided into two subgroups: I-A-i Indochina-South China, and I-A-ii Southeast Assian High Cultures. I-B Assam-Marginal Insular group is divided into two subgroups: I-B-i Southeast Asian Central Horticulturalists, and I-B-ii Peripheral Tubers Horiticulturalists.II Oceanic macro-group falls into two groups: II-A Oceanic Horticulturalists and II-B Foragers. II-A Oceanic Horticulturalsits are divided into two subgroups: II-A-i Melanesian Horticulturalists and II-A-ii Micronesian-Polynesian Horticulturalists. II-B Foragers indicate no subdivision comparable to II-A-i and II-A-ii, and consists in the main of Australian aborigines.This Broad Outline, with seven principal clusters at the level of subgroup, conforms rather well with what anthropologists traditionally and intuitively have thought of the grouping of cultures in these areas. Yet further ramifications raise some questions which call for explanation. Sections,i.e.,the level immediately below subgroups, are mostly still apprehensible, althouth some are already not easy to understand.

对东南亚和大洋洲的文化进行分类，人类学家以不同的方向进行了一次又一次的尝试，其中大多数是直观的。但它们是有地域局限性的，只涵盖某一文化领域，如物质文化或社会组织。我们试图对东南亚和大洋洲的文化进行整体分类，使用统计程序，涵盖文化的所有主要领域。我们对东南亚和大洋洲150个民族单位的100种文化特征的共享程度进行聚类分析，得出了较为清晰的树形图。东南亚和大洋洲的文化可分为两大类：一是东南亚文化，二是大洋洲文化。I东南亚宏观群包括两个群：I- a印度支那核岛群和I- b阿萨姆-边缘岛群。I-A印度支那-核岛群分为两个亚群：I-A-i印度支那-华南和I-A-ii东南亚高文化。I-B阿萨姆邦边缘岛群分为两个亚群：I-B-i东南亚中心园艺师和I-B-ii外围块茎园艺师。海洋宏观群分为两类：II- a类海洋园艺师和II- b类海洋觅食者。II-A级海洋园艺学家分为两个小组：II-A-i美拉尼西亚园艺学家和II-A-ii密克罗尼西亚-波利尼西亚园艺学家。II-B觅食者没有可与II-A-i和II-A-ii相比较的细分，主要由澳大利亚土著组成。这个在亚群水平上有七个主要集群的“大大纲”，与人类学家传统上和直觉上对这些地区文化分组的看法相当吻合。然而，进一步的后果引发了一些需要解释的问题。部分,即。即紧挨着子组的级别，尽管有些已经不容易理解，但大多数仍然是可以理解的。