权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Partnership in 'Education and Welfare' and the Neo-Corporatism in Britain

英国的“教育与福利”合作与新社团主义

基本信息

批准号：
63510143
负责人：
IWAHASHI Norio
金额：
$ 1.09万
依托单位：
Kagoshima University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1988
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1988 至 1989
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

It is the local authorities rather than the Central Government that has been really a prime vehicle in the drive to create the Welfare State since 1945 in Britain. And they has been really supplied both welfare and education services. Because the local autonomy has been traditionally established on the base of powerful locality, and even the intervention of state has been developed on the assumption of local autonomy. That is, the style was the share with administrative accountability between local authority and central government. We find that local authority is never the branch of central authority, but is just local Government. These make the strong effects on the nature and level of welfare and education services which is supplied by local authorities. Therefore we must know that local diversity has come not only from local autonomy ( autonomy ideologies) but also from the differences of policy planning abilities and administrative abilities. As for the problems of co-operation bet … More ween education and welfare, for example, the organization of secondary schools to comprehensive schools are very dependent on the abilities and policy perspectives of local authorities. Besides, under the comprehensive school system after organizing, the needs of caring for the dropouting pupils have been extremely developing, and the nature of the care depends on how successfully the integration and administrative effect between schooling service and child care service are proceeded. For the conquest of devastation caused by the race-oriented privatization in education and welfare, we must not think the intervention of central government is equal to the challenge for local autonomy. We need to study relations between the autonomy and the abilities (included accountability) of local authority. Then, it is very important point that is the corporatistic organizing orientation in the fields of relationship among parents and schools and authorities, though the orientation is not the traditionally established partnership under the post war system, but a new one. Less

自1945年以来，在推动英国建立福利国家的过程中，地方当局而不是中央政府真正发挥了主要作用。他们得到了福利和教育服务。因为传统上，地方自治是建立在强大的地方基础上的，甚至国家的干预也是建立在地方自治的假设之上的。即地方政府与中央政府之间的行政责任分担。我们发现，地方权力从来不是中央权力的分支，而只是地方政府。这些对地方当局提供的福利和教育服务的性质和水平产生了强烈影响。因此，我们必须知道，地方多样性不仅来自地方自治（自治意识），还来自政策规划能力和行政能力的差异。至于教育和福利之间的合作问题，例如，中学到综合学校的组织非常依赖于地方当局的能力和政策观点。此外，在组织后的综合学校制度下，对辍学儿童的照顾需求得到了极大的发展，而照顾的性质取决于学校服务与托儿服务之间的整合和管理效果的成功与否。为了克服教育和福利的种族私营化所造成的破坏，我们不能认为中央政府的干预等于对地方自治的挑战。我们需要研究地方政府的自治与能力（包括问责制）之间的关系。其次，在家长、学校和当局关系领域中，社团主义的组织取向是非常重要的一点，尽管这种取向不是战后体制下传统的伙伴关系，而是一种新的伙伴关系。少