The Basic Study on the History of the Foundation of the Mongolian Empire

蒙古帝国建立史基础研究

• 批准号: 63510202
• 负责人: YOSHIDA Junichi
• 金额: $ 0.77万
• 依托单位: Waseda University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1988
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1988 至 1989
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-63510202/
• 关键词: The Mongolian Empire; " Jami al-tawarikh "; " The Secret History of Mongolia "; Temjin; Chingis khan; Ong khan; father and son relation; The Kereid; 『皇元聖武親征録』; 『元史』太祖本紀; チンギス・ハン; オン・ハン; モンゴル帝国史; 集史; モンゴル秘史; 五族譜; 世界征服者の歴史; コイテンの戦い

It is necessary to study basic historical materials for the analysis and study of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. From this point of view, I made a thorough study on the historical materials such as "Jami al-tawarikh". At the same time, comparing the relevant materials closely, I made a research on the relation between Temjin = Chingis khan and the Kereid on the basis of the said study, I think that the analysis and study of the relation between Temjin and Ong Khan, - the director of the Kereid --, is important. Especially I think that the study and analysis of the r elation in which Ong Khan says that he was Temjin's father and Temijin says that he is Ong khan's son is important. However, because this matter is complicated and covers many fields, this time I focused my study only on the early father and son relation. The conclusion is as follows : (1) It is probably at the beginning of 1180's that Temjin married Borte, greeted Ong Khan by Presenting him with a o … More vercoat made of sable which had been given to Temjin by Borte's mother and said that he was Temjin's father. (2) I don't think that their father and son relation formally started at this time. I don't think also that Temjin became a retainer of Ong khan as some scholors have referred to. In order to prove (2) I analyzed the article on the passages 94 and 104 in "The Secret History of Mongolia" in which Temjin says that Ong khan is his father, and further I analized the relations between them from the beginning of 1180's to around the middle of 1190's which appears in the historical material in which Temjin again claims that Ong khan is his father. As a result I proved that there was little relation between them during the above period ; that it was a make-up story that Borte who had been taken by force by the Merkid was taken back in the war ; that Temjin seemed not so closely related with Ong Khan in those days and that it is considered that after that Temjin informed Ong khan of his so-called first enthronement, which was not Temjin's requirement for Ong khan's approval of his enthronment, but only a report to him. Consequently I stated that the relation to Ong khan was not necessarily important to Temjin in this period. From this time on I would like to study the father and son relation between Ong Khan and Temjin after the middle of 1190's, understand the relation between Temjin and the Kereid and try to approach the most important part of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. Less

分析和研究蒙古帝国建立的历史，必须研究基础史料。从这个角度出发，我对《Jami al-tawarikh》等历史资料进行了深入研究。同时，在此基础上，通过对相关资料的仔细比较，对铁木真成吉思汗与克列王朝的关系进行了研究，认为分析和研究铁木真成吉思汗与克列王朝的首领翁汗之间的关系具有重要的意义。特别是我认为，研究和分析的rebels，其中王汗说，他是Temjin的父亲和Temijin说，他是王汗的儿子是重要的。但由于这一问题的复杂性和涉及面广，所以这次我只把研究的重点放在早期的父子关系上。结论如下：（1）腾冲与孛尔帖结婚的时间可能是1180年代初， ...更多信息 一件貂皮大衣，是博尔特的母亲送给铁金的，据说他是铁金的父亲。(2)我不认为他们的父子关系是在这个时候正式开始的。我也不认为Temjin像一些学者所说的那样成为了Ong Khan的追随者。为了证明（2），本文分析了《蒙古秘史》第94、104段中关于铁木真称王可汗为其父亲的文章，并进一步分析了1180年代初至1190年代中期左右，铁木真再次称王可汗为其父亲的史料中出现的二者之间的关系。结果我证明了在上述时期他们之间几乎没有什么关系;被梅尔基德人强行带走的博尔特在战争中被夺回是一个虚构的故事;在那些日子里，Temjin似乎与Ong Khan没有那么密切的关系，据认为，在Temjin告诉Ong Khan他所谓的第一次登基之后，这不是Temjin要求Ong Khan批准他的登基，而只是向他报告。因此，我说，在这一时期，与王可汗的关系对Temjin来说并不一定重要。从这个时候起，我想研究的父亲和儿子之间的关系王汗和铁木真1190年代中期以后，了解铁木真和Kereid之间的关系，并试图接近历史上最重要的一部分蒙古帝国的基础。少