The Basic Study on the History of the Foundation of the Mongolian Empire

分析和研究蒙古帝国的建国史，有必要研究基本史料。从这个角度出发，我对《Jami al-tawarikh》等史料进行了深入研究。同时，通过对相关资料的比较，在此基础上对提金与克列德的关系进行了研究，认为对提金与克列德之所长王汗关系的分析与研究具有重要意义。尤其是对王汗说他是铁真的父亲，铁米真说他是王汗的儿子的关系的研究和分析是很重要的。然而，由于这件事复杂，涉及的领域很多，所以这次我的研究只集中在早期的父子关系上。结论如下：(1)大概是在1180年初，S嫁给了博尔特，向王汗赠送了一个o…来迎接他更多的紫貂制成的紫貂，这是博尔特的母亲送给铁真的，据说他是铁真的父亲。(2)我不认为他们的父子关系是在这个时候正式开始的。我也不认为铁真像一些学者所说的那样成为王汗的家臣。为了证明(2)我分析了《蒙古秘史》第94、104段中铁金说王汗是他父亲的文章，并进一步分析了史料中出现的铁金再次声称王汗是他父亲的史料中出现的从1180年S开始到1190年左右S之间的关系。因此，我证明了在上述时期，他们之间几乎没有什么关系；被默基德人强行带走的博尔特在战争中被带回的故事是虚构的；铁真在那个时代似乎与王汗没有那么密切的关系，而且人们认为，在那之后，铁真通知了王汗所谓的第一次登基，这不是铁金要求王汗批准他登基的要求，而只是给他的一份报告。因此，我指出，在这一时期，与王汗的关系对铁真来说并不一定重要。从这个时候起，我想研究1190年S中期以后王汗与铁木真的父子关系，了解铁木真与克列伊的关系，并试图接近蒙古帝国建国历史上最重要的部分。较少

It is necessary to study basic historical materials for the analysis and study of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. From this point of view, I made a thorough study on the historical materials such as "Jami al-tawarikh". At the same time, comparing the relevant materials closely, I made a research on the relation between Temjin = Chingis khan and the Kereid on the basis of the said study, I think that the analysis and study of the relation between Temjin and Ong Khan, - the director of the Kereid --, is important. Especially I think that the study and analysis of the r elation in which Ong Khan says that he was Temjin's father and Temijin says that he is Ong khan's son is important. However, because this matter is complicated and covers many fields, this time I focused my study only on the early father and son relation. The conclusion is as follows : (1) It is probably at the beginning of 1180's that Temjin married Borte, greeted Ong Khan by Presenting him with a o … More vercoat made of sable which had been given to Temjin by Borte's mother and said that he was Temjin's father. (2) I don't think that their father and son relation formally started at this time. I don't think also that Temjin became a retainer of Ong khan as some scholors have referred to. In order to prove (2) I analyzed the article on the passages 94 and 104 in "The Secret History of Mongolia" in which Temjin says that Ong khan is his father, and further I analized the relations between them from the beginning of 1180's to around the middle of 1190's which appears in the historical material in which Temjin again claims that Ong khan is his father. As a result I proved that there was little relation between them during the above period ; that it was a make-up story that Borte who had been taken by force by the Merkid was taken back in the war ; that Temjin seemed not so closely related with Ong Khan in those days and that it is considered that after that Temjin informed Ong khan of his so-called first enthronement, which was not Temjin's requirement for Ong khan's approval of his enthronment, but only a report to him. Consequently I stated that the relation to Ong khan was not necessarily important to Temjin in this period. From this time on I would like to study the father and son relation between Ong Khan and Temjin after the middle of 1190's, understand the relation between Temjin and the Kereid and try to approach the most important part of the history of the foundation of the Mongolian Empire. Less