Comparative Analysis of Economic Structural Indicators in Economic Structural Change in Germany and Japan

德国与日本经济结构变迁的经济结构指标比较分析

• 批准号: 02630016
• 负责人: HAMASUNA Keiro
• 金额: $ 0.51万
• 依托单位: Faculty of Economics, Kyushyu-University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1990
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1990 至 1991
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-02630016/
• 关键词: Input-Output table; Economic Structural Indicator; Comparative Study of Economic Indicator; International Comparison; 日独の構造指標; 産業構造; 経済構造; 統計指標; 計画指標; 国際比較; 日独比較

I have verified firstly that the data structure of economic indicators are quite different In Cermany and Japan by material survey and basic analysis. secondly that many planning indicators. determined by the nature of macro economic planning, are based on aggregative economic Indicators from Investigating materials and thirdly that a lot of survey reports have attempted to build up structural lndicators by analyzing Input-output table In the problem of economic-structure-policy from 197Os In West Germany.In addition I have confirmed through the field survey In Germany of the situation for making and analyzing 1-0 table at old West Germany. firstly that the 1-0 tables which have respective character have been made not only by Federal statistic bureau but also by big five economic lnstitutes, for example. DIW at Berlin and so on. secondly that using lnvenestment-goods-transaction-type 1-0 table, many structural descriptive and analytic studies have been done for technical Interindustrial relations as well as using Keynesian 1-0 table which Is generally used In Japan and measure the amount of Induced products by final demand move so It Is necessary to essentially reconsider the Interindustrial analysis methods to follow the change of tachnical coefficient during the period of industrial change.

笔者通过资料调查和基本分析，首先验证了Cerany和日本经济指标的数据结构有很大的不同。其次，规划指标众多。由宏观经济计划的性质决定的，是以调查材料中的综合经济指标为依据的。第三，自上世纪70年代以来，许多调查报告试图通过分析西德经济结构政策问题的投入产出表来建立结构指标。另外，我通过在德国的实地调查证实了旧西德制定和分析1：0表的情况。首先，不仅联邦统计局制作了各具特色的1-0表，例如五大经济机构也制作了1-0表。柏林的DIW等等。其次，利用收入-商品-交易-类型1-0表对技术产业间关系进行了结构性的描述性和分析性研究，并利用日本普遍使用的凯恩斯1-0表来衡量最终需求变动引起的产品数量，因此有必要从本质上重新考虑产业间分析方法，以跟踪产业变迁期间技术系数的变化。

项目成果

K. HAMASUNA: "Input-Output Definitions of Inter-Industrial relations table" Journal of Political Economy, (Kyushu-University). 57. NR. 5・6 (1992)

K. HAMASUNA：“产业间关系表的投入产出定义”《政治经济学杂志》，（九州大学）57. NR 5・6（1992）。

浜 砂敬郎: "経済計画と国民経済計算" 『経済学研究』(九州大学). 第57巻4・5号. (1991)

Keiro Hama Suna：《经济计划与国民账户》经济研究（九州大学），第 57 卷，第 4 期和第 5 期。（1991 年）