Comparative Analysis of Economic Structural Indicators in Economic Structural Change in Germany and Japan

通过资料调研和基本分析，首次证实了中日两国经济指标的数据结构存在较大差异。二是规划指标多。由宏观经济规划的性质决定，第三，在经济结构政策问题上，德国自1970年代以来，许多调查报告都试图通过分析投入产出表来建立结构指标。此外，笔者还通过对德国的实地调查，证实了在经济结构政策问题上，0表在旧西德国。第一，不仅联邦统计局，而且五大经济研究所都编制了各具特色的1 - 0表。柏林的DIW等。其次，使用投资-货物-交易型1 - 0表，许多结构性的描述性和分析性研究已经完成了技术产业间关系，以及使用凯恩斯1-因此，有必要从根本上重新考虑产业间分析方法，以跟踪技术变化。在产业转型期。

I have verified firstly that the data structure of economic indicators are quite different In Cermany and Japan by material survey and basic analysis. secondly that many planning indicators. determined by the nature of macro economic planning, are based on aggregative economic Indicators from Investigating materials and thirdly that a lot of survey reports have attempted to build up structural lndicators by analyzing Input-output table In the problem of economic-structure-policy from 197Os In West Germany.In addition I have confirmed through the field survey In Germany of the situation for making and analyzing 1-0 table at old West Germany. firstly that the 1-0 tables which have respective character have been made not only by Federal statistic bureau but also by big five economic lnstitutes, for example. DIW at Berlin and so on. secondly that using lnvenestment-goods-transaction-type 1-0 table, many structural descriptive and analytic studies have been done for technical Interindustrial relations as well as using Keynesian 1-0 table which Is generally used In Japan and measure the amount of Induced products by final demand move so It Is necessary to essentially reconsider the Interindustrial analysis methods to follow the change of tachnical coefficient during the period of industrial change.