Joint Research on Artificial Intelligence in Statute and Case

人工智能法规与案例联合研究

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    03044133
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    日本
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
  • 财政年份:
    1991
  • 资助国家:
    日本
  • 起止时间:
    1991 至 1993
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

The object of this international joint research is for the researchers from Japan as well as Germany and the United States of America to analyze logically 'rule based reasoning', which belongs to the continental statutory law culture and 'case based reasoning' which belongs to the Anglo-American case law culture, clarify the mechanism of the interpretation of legal rules and legal analogy and amalgamate a rule based legal reasoning system with a case based legal reasoning system. In this international joint research the following results have been achieved :(1)Logical structures of 'rule based reasoning' in the continental law and 'case based reasoning' in the Anglo-American law have been in many points clarified.(2)The relationship between rule based reasoning and case based reasoning in law and the way to combine the both have been also clarified.(3)The methods of the representation of legal knowledge in terms of the logical flow chart and the compound predicate formula (CPF) has bee … More n developed.(4)The logical structure of the second part of United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) has been clarified. The part was represented in the computer in terms of the logical flow chart in English as well as in Japanese and also in terms of CPF partly. These knowledge representation methods have been adapted as a common representation form between the Japanese researchers and the American researchers.(5)Japanese researchers and American researchers discussed interpretation problems of several articles of CISG on the basis of logical flow charts of CISG, so that it was proved that this representation form is a fruitful method for Japanese and American lawyers, who have the different language and culture, to communicate with each other.(6)The several interesting issues of interpretation problems of CISG have been found. The relationship between these different interpretations and the different cultures of law became clear.(7)A Hyper Card system of CISG in German, English and French has been developed by the German researchers.On the following points the final object of the joint research to make a integrated system has been achieved only in the very restricted range :(1)A rule base legal reasoning system as well as a experimental system of legal analogy was developed. However we could not install any amalgamating system of rule based reasoning and case based reasoning in law.(2)Some experimental generating system of Japanese legal text and English Legal text from CPF was developed. However we could not develop any interface between Japanese and English language in law. Less
本次国际合作研究的目的是让日本、德国和美国的研究者对大陆制定法文化中的“基于规则的推理”和英美判例法文化中的“基于案例的推理"进行逻辑分析,明确法律的规则解释机制和法律的类推机制,融合基于规则的法律的推理系统和基于案例的法律的推理系统。在国际合作研究中,取得了以下成果:(1)对大陆法中的“基于规则的推理”和英美法中的“基于判例的推理”的逻辑结构进行了多方面的澄清。(2)阐明了基于规则推理与基于案例推理在法律中的关系以及两者的联合收割机结合方式。(3)提出了法律的知识的逻辑流程图和复合谓词公式表示方法, ...更多信息 n发展。(4)明确了《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(《销售公约》)第二部分的逻辑结构。该部分在计算机中以英文和日文的逻辑流程图以及部分CPF表示。这些知识表示方法已被改编为日本研究人员和美国研究人员之间的共同表示形式。(5)日本学者和美国学者以《公约》的逻辑流程图为基础,讨论了《公约》若干条款的解释问题,证明了这种表述形式是语言和文化不同的日本和美国律师进行交流的有效方法。(6)发现了《销售公约》解释中的几个有趣的问题,这些不同的解释与不同的法律文化之间的关系变得清晰起来。(7)A CISG的德、英、法三种文本的HyperCard系统是由德国学者共同开发的,但在以下几个方面的联合研究中,最终的目标是在非常有限的范围内实现一个完整的系统:(1)开发了一个规则库法律的推理系统和一个法律的类比实验系统。然而,我们无法在法律中设置任何基于规则推理和基于案例推理的融合系统。(2)开发了基于CPF的日语法律的文本和英语法律的文本的实验生成系统。然而,我们无法在日语和英语之间建立任何法律接口。少

项目成果

期刊论文数量(17)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Hajime Yoshino: ""Knowledge Representation of Legal Expert System LES-3 with Legal Meta-inference"" Proc.Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems. 1-9 (1992)
Hajime Yoshino:““具有法律元推理的法律专家系统 LES-3 的知识表示””Proc.法律知识和法律推理系统。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
Makoto Haraguchi: ""What kinds of Konwledge and Inferences Are Needed to Realize Legal Reasoning?"" Proc.Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems. 139-146 (1992)
原口诚:“实现法律推理需要什么样的知识和推理?”Proc.法律知识和法律推理系统。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
Makoto Haraguchi: "“What kinds of knowledge and Inferences Are Needed to Realize Legal Reasoning?"" Proc.Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems. 139-146 (1992)
Makoto Haraguchi:“实现法律推理需要什么样的知识和推理?”Proc.法律知识和法律推理系统 139-146 (1992)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
Seiichirou Sakurai: ""Abduction in Legal Reasoning"" Proc.Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems. 123-130 (1992)
Seiichirou Sakurai:“法律推理中的溯因”Proc.法律知识和法律推理系统。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
Seiichirou Sakurai: "“Abduction in Legal Reasoning"" Proc.Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning Systems. 123-130 (1992)
Seiichirou Sakurai:““法律推理中的溯因””Proc.法律知识和法律推理系统 123-130 (1992)。
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
  • 通讯作者:
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

YOSHINO Hajime其他文献

YOSHINO Hajime的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('YOSHINO Hajime', 18)}}的其他基金

Jamming-glass transitions in a frustrated Josephson junction array
受挫约瑟夫森结阵列中的干扰玻璃转变
  • 批准号:
    21540386
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Research on Development of Legal Education Methods to Promote Creative Legal Minds - Towards the Science of Law for Law Creation
发展法学教育方法以促进创造性法律思维的研究——走向法律创造的法学
  • 批准号:
    14001003
  • 财政年份:
    2002
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research
Development of Legal Education Methods Using Legal Knowledge Base System
利用法律知识库系统开发法制教育方法
  • 批准号:
    10359004
  • 财政年份:
    1998
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
Research on Development of Legal Expert System
法律专家系统开发研究
  • 批准号:
    05208104
  • 财政年份:
    1998
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (A)
International Joint Research on Comparative Knowledge Analysis of CISG
CISG比较知识分析国际联合研究
  • 批准号:
    10044039
  • 财政年份:
    1998
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
A Basic Study of Legal Expert System--Artificial Intelligence Aproach to Legal Reasoning--
法律专家系统基础研究--人工智能法律推理方法--
  • 批准号:
    02301071
  • 财政年份:
    1990
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)

相似海外基金

A Comparative Study of the Code-Statute Law in Ancient Japan and the Tang and the Song: Towards the Compilation of a New Torei Shui
日本古代法典与唐宋成文法的比较研究:迈向新《条例》的编纂
  • 批准号:
    21320119
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
The Law-Cultured Study about the Collaborations between the National Statute Law and the Traditional Order Model in the South East Asia and the Middle East Area
东南亚及中东地区国家成文法与传统秩序模式协作的法文化研究
  • 批准号:
    17330003
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 10.24万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了