权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility Under International Law

国际法下国家责任法的转变

基本信息

批准号：
03620010
负责人：
MATSUI Yoshiro
金额：
$ 1.09万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1991
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1991 至 1992
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-03620010/
关键词：
1930 Codification Conference Primary Rules Law of State Responsibility Condification of International Law International Law Commission Traditional International Law Secondary Rules Structural Change of the International Community 国家責任外交

项目摘要

1.The traditional law of State responsibility focussed on the responsibility of State for damage done in its territory to foreigners, because the traditional international law itself was a legal catalyzer for the capitalist world market. This research surveys the process of transformation of such traditional law into the law of State responsibility for international wrongful acts in general of State , during the United Nations codification efforts.2."The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility at the United nations -- The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility (2)--"(Kokusaiho Gaiko Zassi, Vol.91 No.4, 1992) examined the process and backgrounds of the above-mentioned transformation of law of State responsibility in the deliberation of the United Nations organs from 1949 to 1963. This transformation was necessitated by a structural change of the international community since the Second World War. In order to secure codification of the law of State responsibility in a "divided world" it was considered inevitable to focus on the "secondary rules" divorced from the "primary rules", on which views of States often conflicted severely."The Law of State Responsibility in the 1930 Codification Conference -- a Plerude for the Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility"(in,Shoichi Kidana, et al., eds, Contemporary Issues of International Economic Law, Toshindo, to be published in 1993) makes it clear that though the 1930 Conference has failed to codify the law of State responsibility because of antagonism of States concerning the "primary rules" on the treatment of foreigners, a wide range of agreement has been established on the "secondary rules", and a view has already been asserted that the Conference has to focus on the "secondary rules" in order to secure condification in this field of law.

1.传统的国家责任法侧重于国家在其领土内对外国人造成损害的责任，因为传统国际法本身就是资本主义世界市场的法律催化剂。本研究调查了在联合国编纂工作期间将这种传统法律转变为国家对一般国际不法行为的国家责任法的过程。《联合国国家责任法的转变——国家责任法的转变（二）》（《国报报》1992年第91卷第4期）考察了1949年至1963年联合国机关审议中上述国家责任法转变的过程和背景。这一转变是第二次世界大战以来国际社会结构变化所必需的。为了确保在一个“分裂的世界”中编纂国家责任法，人们认为不可避免地要把重点放在与“主要规则”分离的“次要规则”上，各国对这些规则的看法往往严重冲突。《1930年编纂会议上的国家责任法——国家责任法转型的序文》（见Kidana Shoichi等主编，《国际经济法当代问题》，日本东京，1993年出版）明确指出，尽管1930年会议未能编纂国家责任法，是因为各国对对待外国人的“主要规则”持反对态度，已经就“次要规则”达成了广泛的协议，并且已经断言，会议必须集中讨论“次要规则”，以便在这一法律领域取得条件。