权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Dominance of Group Information in Japan : Perceiving persons and groups.

日本群体信息的主导地位：感知个人和群体。

基本信息

批准号：
09610141
负责人：
SUGIMORI Shinkichi
金额：
$ 1.6万
依托单位：
Tokyo Kasei University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

We have conducted three types of studies which correspond to the study one, two, and three.Our research results consist of 7 papers whose summaries are shown as follows.RESEARCH RESULTS (1), (5) Illusory correlation studies such as Hamilton ＆ Gifford(1976) have suggested that minority members of the smaller group are likely to be overestimated their number, and influence the group impression. But in Japan, these effects are likely to be overshadowed by more predominant and indigenous variable ; negativity bias toward smaller groups. We have found that when the stimulus groups are just like aggregates or collection of individuals, Hamilton type of results are observed, whereas the stimulus groups' "entitativity" is high, the Japanese type of results are obtained. [These results correspond to the Study two.]RESEARCH RESULT (2) In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that the same list of opinions toward a social issue (e.g., social suitability of nuclear electronic power) is cognitively more deeply processed when it is assumed to be obtained as a group consensus, compared to aggregates of individual opinions. We have partial support of this hypothesis. [Study three]RESEARCH RESULTS (3), (4) In these studies, we have tested the hypothesis that the threshold of perceiving "groupness" would be higher when the perceivers are collectivist that individualist. Through the ratings of "groupness" of computer animation of groups of human, fishes, boxes of varying degrees of dispersion, we found that the results support our hypothesis. [Study one]RESEARCH RESULTS (6), (7) In these studies, our basic premise that the social perception and behavior in western society is more individual-based, inter-independent, while those in eastern society is based on more relation-oriented, interrelated, and interdependent attitude. [These results correspond to all three studies conceptually]

研究结果（1）、（5）根据汉密尔顿和吉福德（1976）等的错觉相关研究，小群体中的少数成员容易高估自己的人数，从而影响群体印象。但在日本，这些影响可能会被更占主导地位的本土变量所掩盖;对较小群体的负面偏见。我们发现，当刺激群体是个体的集合体或集合体时，得到的是汉密尔顿型结果，而当刺激群体的“实体性”高时，得到的是日本型结果。[这些结果与研究2一致。]研究结果（2）在这项研究中，我们测试了一个假设，即对一个社会问题的同一系列意见（例如，核电子功率的社会适用性）与个人意见的集合相比，当它被假设为作为群体共识获得时，在认知上被更深入地处理。我们有部分证据支持这一假设。[研究三]研究结果（3）、（4）在这些研究中，我们验证了集体主义者比个人主义者感知“群体性”的阈值更高的假设。通过对计算机动画中的人类、鱼类、箱子等群体的不同分散程度的“群体性”进行评分，发现结果支持了我们的假设。[研究一]研究结果（6）、（7）在这些研究中，我们的基本前提是西方社会的社会认知和行为更多地基于个人，相互独立，而东方社会的社会认知和行为更多地基于关系导向，相互关联和相互依存的态度。[这些结果在概念上与所有三项研究相对应]