"Order and Rights" in the late-century Japanese Justice System

本文选择了以下几个问题进行深入的理论分析：1、日本法院适用非法证据排除规则的现状，以及为维护正当的诉讼利益而对该规则进行更宽松的适用的建议。2、从日本法院审理的大量外国被告案件来看，它们有时并不享有同等的诉讼程序的全面性;最好的例子是在诉讼过程中的无线翻译设备。本研究提出了使用该设备的一些标准，重点是被告人了解自己的审判的权利。3：听力障碍的被告人遭受审判的完全记忆，有时是由于残疾导致的抽象思维水平低。在某些情况下，驳回案件msut是高度推荐的。4：在事实调查方面的专业法官需要普遍改进。5：为了保证双重审判权，检察官不应该都被要求上诉的理由在事实调查中的错误在一审判决。

Here, several topics were selected to further field resarch ad theoretical an alysys.1 : Present extent of the exclusionary rule in Japanaese courts, and the proposal to apply the rule more leniently to further the due proseccinterest.2 : With th obsevation of lots of foreign defendats cases in Japanese courts, they sometimes do not enjoy the same comprehensive level of court proceeding ; god example is the wireless-translation equipment during the proceeding. This research porposes some standards for usage of this device with the emphasis on the rights of the defendant to understand their own trial.3 : Hearing-impaired defendant suffers from total imeomprehension of the trial, sometimes becauseof the low level of abstract thiking coused by the handicap. In some cases, dismissal of the case msut be highly recommened.4 : general improvement in fact-finding aspects of the professional judges are needed.5 : To guarantee the right to double-joepardy, the prosecutor should not be all owed to appeal on the ground of the mistakes in fact-finding in the decision of the first instance.