The Change of the mythological Space in late Tokugawa Periods and its Study frorm ethical thoughts

元森·诺里纳加开始研究高知氏神话，他没有解读高知术，而是笔记(忠实地在高知术上写笔记)。然而，他自封的弟子平田真术超越了他的师父，改变了神话的文本。他对NIONSHOKI的评价多于对KOJIKI的评价。本文的研究对象是HITATA的接班人Suzuki Sigeyane，他最初和Hirata一样，开始研究NIONSHOKI，并试图制作他的原始神话文本，但后来放弃了他的传统。然后他在NIHONSHOKI上写了笔记。笔记非常有趣。他认为NIHONSHOKI文本是一个故事，也就是所谓的叙事。他指出了事物、空间、语言、意识等的起源。我们还必须研究饭田武藏。他的研究继承了KOKUGAKU方法，但它联系了现代神话学对日本神话、小木和NIHONSHOKOKI的研究。这一研究将有助于我们理解德川晚期新宗教之间的共同点，例如，它的组织与“神话空间的变化”有着深刻的联系。

Motoori Norinaga began to study the myth, KOJIKI.He didn't interpret KOJIKI, but note (write notes on KOJIKI faithfully.).However, his self-appoinnted disciple HIRATA ATSUTANE step over his master, and changed the myth texst. He estimate NIHONSHOKI more than KOJIKI.This study focus on the successors of HITATA.SUZUKI SIGEYANE, One of them, at first just like HIRATA, began to study NIONSHOKI, and tried to make his original myth text, but later give up his traial. Then he wrote notes on NIHONSHOKI.The Notes is very interesting. He thinks NIHONSHOKI text as a story, socalled narrative. He pointe out the origins of things, space, language, consciousness and so on. We must also study IIda TAKESATO.His study succeeded KOKUGAKU method, but it links the modern mytokogical study of Japanese mytos, KOJIKI and NIHONSHOKI.This study will help us to understand the common ground between the new religions in late Tokugawa periods, for exsample, TENRIKYO.Its organisation is deeply conneccted with "the change of mythological space".