权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Exploring the 'Continuity of English Prose' and Variant Manuscript Evidence Studies: with particular reference to Wulfstan manuscripts

探索“英语散文的连续性”和变体手稿证据研究：特别参考沃尔夫斯坦手稿

基本信息

批准号：
10610460
负责人：
KUBOUCHI Tadao
金额：
$ 2.43万
依托单位：
Teikyo University (1999)The University of Tokyo (1998)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1998
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1998 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The question of 'the continuity of English prose' is one that still needs to be investigated, The paucity of English literary texts during the transition period has often made historical linguists think of the investigation of the 'continuity' question as something next to impossible. But the call of 'Back to the manuscripts' remind s us of the continuity in transmission and dissemination of Old English texts represented by versions of Elfric and Wulfstan texts even after 1066. Variant texts produced by the process represent scribal responses which might certainly provide insights revealing the linguistic situation and change in the transition period. These could yield a clue to the examination of the 'continuity' problem (see Kubouchi (1998), Kubouchi (1999) and Kubouchi (March 2000) below).There is no need to emphasise the usefulness of electronic texts, particularly when offered on a diplomatic basis. A single diplomatic transcription is useful enough, but in the case of works which are preserved to us in more than one manuscript it is self-evident that individual manuscript texts, arranged in parallel text format line by line acquire more value than they have individually. It is hoped that Kubouchi (1999) and Kubouchi (February 2000), which is a product of the present 2-year research project and a trial revised version of Bethurum (1957), will draw attention to the usefulness of an electronic corpus of diplomatic parallel manuscript texts as a tool for historical studies of Early English, as well as to the relevance of manuscript evidence studies to syntactic and stylistic studies of linguistic changes in Old and Middle English. The final version of our Wulfstan texts will contain in computer-readable text-file form all the manuscript texts relevant to Wulfstan studies.

“英语散文的连续性”是一个尚待研究的问题，转型时期英语文学文本的匮乏，往往使历史语言学家认为对“连续性”问题的研究几乎是不可能的。但《回到手稿》的呼唤提醒S，即使在1066年以后，以埃尔弗里克和伍尔夫斯坦文本的版本为代表的古英语文本的传播和传播仍然是连续的。这一过程产生的不同文本代表了抄写者的反应，这当然可能提供揭示过渡时期的语言情况和变化的见解。这些可以为审查“连续性”问题提供线索(见下面的库布奇(1998)、库布奇(1999)和库布奇(2000年3月))。没有必要强调电子文本的用处，特别是在外交基础上提供的文本。一份外交抄本是足够有用的，但在我们保存在不止一份手稿中的作品中，不言而喻，以平行文本格式逐行排列的个别手稿文本获得的价值比它们单独获得的价值更大。库布奇(1999)和库布奇(2000年2月)是目前为期两年的研究项目的产物，也是贝瑟鲁姆(1957)的试行修订版，希望能引起人们注意外交平行手稿文本电子语料库作为研究早期英语历史的工具的有用性，以及手稿证据研究与古英语和中古英语语言变化的句法和文体研究的相关性。我们的伍尔夫斯坦文本的最终版本将以计算机可读的文本文件的形式包含与伍尔夫斯坦研究有关的所有手稿文本。