A comparative study between Japan and France, concerning the subjects of the new "Fundamental Act of Agriculture" and the possible revisions of the agricultural land tenure system

日本的《粮食农业农村基本法》提出了广泛的政策议程，但除了以市场为导向的价格政策外，它并不总是对政策方向提出系统的概述，尽管它几乎考虑了所有方面。从“基本计划”和基于《同案法》的具体实现措施来看，两者之间明显缺乏协调或相关性。这主要是由于在经济效益的要求与农业多功能保护之间的关系问题上还存在一些有待解决的问题。与日本不同，欧盟在抑制支撑价格的同时，制定了农村发展政策作为第二支柱，以追求保留欧洲模式的农业和农村地区。例如，法国的新“基本法”发明了“土地承包”制度，在对个体家庭农场的财政援助中确保农业的多功能作用，这证明了日本农业政策的未来主题。

The Japanese Fundamental Act of Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas puts up a wide range of policy agenda, but it doesn' t always present systematic outlines for policy orientations except such as for the market-oriented price policy, even though it takes almost all the aspects into considerations.Referring to the "basic plans" and concretely realized measures based on the ditto Act, remarkably there is a sharp insufficiency of coordination or correlation among them.It's mainly because some problems remain unsolved concerning the arrangements between the imperatives of economic efficiency and preservation of the agricultural multi-function.In contrast to Japan, EU, while restraining the supported prices, has set up a rural development policy as the second pillar in pursuit of preserving the European-model agriculture and rural areas.The French new "Fundamental Act" , for example, has invented the system of "CTE" (territorial contract of farming) that ensures the multi-fonction roles of agriculture throughout the financial aids to individual family farms, which proves future themes to be settled for the Japanese agricultural policy.