A comparative study between Japan and France, concerning the subjects of the new "Fundamental Act of Agriculture" and the possible revisions of the agricultural land tenure system

日本《粮食农业农村基本法》提出了广泛的政策议程，但除了市场化的价格政策外，几乎考虑到了所有方面，并没有系统地提出政策取向的大纲。参照以《粮食农业农村基本法》为基础的“基本计划”和具体实现措施，值得注意的是，它们之间的协调或相关性明显不足，主要是在经济效率的需要与农业多功能的保持之间的安排上存在一些问题没有解决。法国新《基本法》提出了“CTE”制度，并将农村发展政策作为第二支柱，以维护欧洲模式的农业和农村（土地耕作合同），确保农业在向各个家庭农场提供财政援助的过程中发挥多方面的作用，这为日本农业政策的未来确定了主题。

The Japanese Fundamental Act of Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas puts up a wide range of policy agenda, but it doesn' t always present systematic outlines for policy orientations except such as for the market-oriented price policy, even though it takes almost all the aspects into considerations.Referring to the "basic plans" and concretely realized measures based on the ditto Act, remarkably there is a sharp insufficiency of coordination or correlation among them.It's mainly because some problems remain unsolved concerning the arrangements between the imperatives of economic efficiency and preservation of the agricultural multi-function.In contrast to Japan, EU, while restraining the supported prices, has set up a rural development policy as the second pillar in pursuit of preserving the European-model agriculture and rural areas.The French new "Fundamental Act" , for example, has invented the system of "CTE" (territorial contract of farming) that ensures the multi-fonction roles of agriculture throughout the financial aids to individual family farms, which proves future themes to be settled for the Japanese agricultural policy.