A comparative study between Japan and France, concerning the subjects of the new "Fundamental Act of Agriculture" and the possible revisions of the agricultural land tenure system

日本《食品、农业和农村基本法案》提出了广泛的政策议程，但除了市场导向的价格政策外，它并不总是系统地提出政策取向的大纲，尽管它几乎考虑了所有方面。参照《基本计划》和以该法案为基础的具体实施措施，它们之间存在严重的协调或相关性不足。主要是因为在经济效率要求与农业多功能保护之间的安排方面仍有一些问题尚未解决。与日本、欧盟在限制支持价格的同时，将农村发展政策作为保护欧洲式农业和农村的第二支柱，法国新的《基本法案》就发明了“土地承包”制度，在对个体家庭农场的财政援助中确保了农业的多功能作用，这证明了日本农业政策未来的主题是确定的。

The Japanese Fundamental Act of Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas puts up a wide range of policy agenda, but it doesn' t always present systematic outlines for policy orientations except such as for the market-oriented price policy, even though it takes almost all the aspects into considerations.Referring to the "basic plans" and concretely realized measures based on the ditto Act, remarkably there is a sharp insufficiency of coordination or correlation among them.It's mainly because some problems remain unsolved concerning the arrangements between the imperatives of economic efficiency and preservation of the agricultural multi-function.In contrast to Japan, EU, while restraining the supported prices, has set up a rural development policy as the second pillar in pursuit of preserving the European-model agriculture and rural areas.The French new "Fundamental Act" , for example, has invented the system of "CTE" (territorial contract of farming) that ensures the multi-fonction roles of agriculture throughout the financial aids to individual family farms, which proves future themes to be settled for the Japanese agricultural policy.