Empirical Research of Framing Effect on Political Cognition

政治认知框架效应的实证研究

• 批准号: 11610141
• 负责人: YAMADA Kazunari
• 金额: $ 2.37万
• 依托单位: Hosei University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1999
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1999 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11610141/
• 关键词: framing effect; split ballot technique; poll

Study 1 investigated the robustness of the framing effect on Asian Disease Problem in non-undergraduates. Results differed form those published by Tversky ＆ Kahneman (1981) in two respects. First, the framing effect was weak. Second, no framing effect was found in some demographic groups. These findings suggested that (a) the bias may not be as robust as has been believed, and (b) unidentified factors affect weather a framing effect is observed.Study 2 investigated the misreporting. In this study, respondents were asked if they were in favor or opposed to 4 bills. Consequently, 15% respondents bluff when asked their opinion on things they know nothing about. These findings suggested the framing effect of question-format and the critical problem of opinion poll.The outline of the survey is as follows. (1) Date : March, 2000. (2) Sample : 1,200 samples of the Tokyo (Japan) population over 20 years old. (3) Sampling method : Random sampling. (4) Valid sample : 722 (60.2%). (5) Survey method : Placement method (split ballot technique).

研究一考察了非大学生对亚洲疾病问题框架效应的稳健性。结果与Tversky & Kahneman（1981）发表的结果在两个方面不同。首先，框架效应很弱。第二，在某些人口群体中没有发现框架效应。这些发现表明：（a）偏差可能并不像人们所认为的那样强烈，（B）未识别的因素影响是否观察到框架效应。在这项研究中，受访者被问及他们是赞成还是反对4项法案。因此，15%的受访者在被问及对他们一无所知的事情的看法时会海崖。这些发现反映了问题形式的框架效应和民意调查的关键问题。(1)日期：2000年3月。(2)样本：东京（日本）20岁以上人口的1 200个样本。(3)抽样方法：随机抽样。(4)有效样本：722例（60.2%）。(5)调查方法：安置法（分裂投票技术）。