权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Research of the education law conflict at the age of organizing process of national education system in France

法国国民教育体系组建过程中的教育法冲突研究

基本信息

批准号：
11610294
负责人：
TAKATSU Yoshinori
金额：
$ 1.15万
依托单位：
Osaka University of Economics
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-11610294/
关键词：
France school textbook compulsory education The Third Republic freedom of education parents' participation Catholicism school textbook examination 検定制度父母参加教師の教育権教育裁判

项目摘要

It is a text book that it became a law conflict problem at the start of nations educational system in France. The reason is because the Catholicism influence took a critical attitude to compulsory education even after the establishment of the education system. The political position of the Catholicism was conservative. Therefore, Compulsory education was supported by republicans who were progressive. However, from the politics situation in that time, the compulsory education was not necessarily even to correspond to the right of children. Jean Mace that campaigned for compulsory educational system around 1870 was one of supporters of conscription system. And in his discussion, the evil by universal suffrage is said to be removed by compulsory education. Namely republic is defended from the beginning of compulsory education system.The school textbook examination system was introduced after the revolution. But it was failed by these laws, Guizot's law (on June 28 1833 ), Regulation of 27 February 1835, and Falloux'law (on March 15 1850 ). At the 3rd republic, free selection system was introduced by these laws (arret, on June 16 1880 at elementary school and Circulation on October 13 1881 at secondary). Therefore, titularly, textbook selection has come to the independent judgment of teachers. After that, tachers has become criticism object by the parents of Catholicism. However, the judicial authorities avoided that is related to the educational contents. They limited a point of argument to the defect presence on Due process of law. They defended the educationl intervention from Catholicism.

它在法国国民教育制度建立之初就成为一个法律冲突问题，这是一部教科书。这是因为即使在教育制度建立之后，天主教的影响也对义务教育持批判态度。天主教的政治立场是保守的。因此，义务教育得到了进步的共和主义者的支持。然而，从当时的政治形势来看，义务教育并不一定与儿童权利相对应。1870年前后为义务教育制度而奔走的让·梅斯是征兵制的支持者之一。在他的讨论中，普选的邪恶被强迫教育所消除。即从义务教育制度开始捍卫共和制，革命后实行教科书考试制度。但是，基佐的法律（1833年6月28日）、1835年2月27日的条例和法卢的法律（1850年3月15日）都失败了。在第三共和国，自由选择制度引入了这些法律（arret，1880年6月16日在小学和流通1881年10月13日在中学）。因此，名义上，教科书的选择已经到了教师的独立判断。此后，犹太人成为天主教家长批评的对象。然而，司法当局回避了与教育内容有关的问题。他们将争论的焦点局限于正当法律程序的缺陷存在。他们为天主教的教育干预辩护。