权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Research on Laws for Oppressing the Jews and the Euthanasia Bull in Nazi Germany

纳粹德国压迫犹太人和安乐死公牛的法律研究

基本信息

批准号：
11620006
负责人：
SANO Makoto
金额：
$ 1.09万
依托单位：
Nara University of Education (2000)Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (1999)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. The purpose of this research is to show the historical and ideological context of the so-called euthanasia program in Nazi Germany and of the holocaust that actually has been underway since the enactment of the 1935 Nuremberg race laws. Especially, the question we have to ask here is to show the social background of the euthanasia law that was not in the end enacted and many laws for oppressing the Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930's. I could write a paper about a subject of research, that is Nazi's euthanasia law. In this paper, I clarified some points at issue in Nazi's euthanasia bill that was shelved. We tend to think the application of eugenics as a main cause in Nazi's euthanasia program. But I proved in this paper that the most important cause in Nazi's euthanasia program consists in the benefits to society, the economic efficiency, by using many materials about an inquiry commission for Nazi's euthanasia law.2. On the study of many laws for oppressing the Jews. I clarified something of some German lawyer's views of the Jews and of a constitutional state. In particular, it became evident that 1) the choice according to circumstances of three concepts of "homogeneity", "a same race" and "the identity of an only race", such as Carl Schmitt argued, became a rhetorical element for oppressing the Jews, and 2) the antagonism between the Germanys and the Jews was artificially created, by distinguishing between "German law (Recht)" and "Jewish law (Gesetz)" and placing Nazi's thought on the side of German's racial law and Jewish thought on the side of legal positivism.

1.这项研究的目的是展示纳粹德国所谓安乐死计划的历史和意识形态背景，以及自1935年纽伦堡种族法律颁布以来实际上一直在进行的大屠杀。特别是我们在这里要问的问题是，展示安乐死法律最终没有颁布的社会背景，以及三十年代纳粹德国压迫犹太人的许多法律，S。我可以写一篇关于一个研究课题的论文，那就是纳粹的安乐死法律。在本文中，我澄清了被搁置的纳粹安乐死法案中的几个争议点。我们倾向于认为优生学的应用是纳粹安乐死计划的主要原因。但在本文中，笔者利用大量有关纳粹安乐死法律调查委员会的资料，论证了纳粹安乐死计划最重要的原因在于社会效益、经济效益。关于压迫犹太人的许多法律的研究。我澄清了一些德国律师对犹太人和宪政国家的看法。特别是，显而易见的是，1)根据情况选择卡尔·施密特等“同质”、“同一种族”和“唯一种族的身份”三个概念，成为压迫犹太人的修辞要素；2)德国人和犹太人之间的对立是人为制造的，它区分了“德国法律(Recht)”和“犹太法律(Gesetz)”，并将纳粹思想置于德国种族法和犹太思想一边的法律实证主义一边。