权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Study of the Alternative to Neoliberalism in the Theory of Development and Transition : Rehabilitation of Publicness

发展与转型理论中新自由主义的替代研究:公共性的恢复

基本信息

批准号：
11630051
负责人：
YANO Shuichi
金额：
$ 1.92万
依托单位：
Takasaki City University of Economics
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The doctrine of the IMF and World Bank is widely known as the Washington Consensus, which is based on neoclassical economics. Neoclassical prescriptions applied indiscriminately throughout the world often damage long-term productivity and the stability of society in each subject country. In recent years, Japanese aid circles have criticized the Washington Consensus and assumed "Japanesque Developmentalism" to be an alternative to it. However, the mainstream view expressed in Japanese development study literature is controversial in the sense that this approach presuppose that only an authoritarian state can identify the national interest and lead a process of development or transition to the market.Neoliberalism presupposes the ideal market, and Japanesque Developmentalism presupposes the ideal state. Such fundamentalistic views might cause destructive influences in the real world. To be required is not a splendid fundamentalism, but the organization of human intelligence in order to induce real changes.This study searches alternative theories and policies in pioneers of development economics, especially, A.0. Hirschman. His methodology, "possibilism", is free from "fetisization of prerequisites" or consolidated planning. When he considers social change or development, Hirschman make use of effective concepts, such as "exit-voice", "latitude-discipline", etc., and pay attention to the process of social learning. Possibilism may consequently throw new light on the public sphere and civil society that have been abandoned by neoliberalism and developmentalism.

IMF和世界银行的理论被广泛称为华盛顿共识，它建立在新古典主义经济学的基础上。在世界各地不分青红皂白地使用新古典主义处方往往会损害每个受试国的长期生产力和社会稳定。近年来，日本援助界对华盛顿共识提出批评，认为“日本式的发展主义”是替代它的一种选择。然而，日本发展研究文献中表达的主流观点是有争议的，因为这种方法的前提是只有威权国家才能识别国家利益并领导发展或向市场过渡的过程。新自由主义前提是理想的市场，而日本式的发展主义前提是理想状态。这种原教旨主义的观点可能会在现实世界中造成破坏性影响。被需要不是一种辉煌的原教旨主义，而是人类智力的组织，以引发真正的变化。本研究在发展经济学的先驱，特别是A.0。赫希曼。他的方法论，“可能性论”，没有“前提拜物教”或统一计划。赫希曼在思考社会变迁或发展时，运用了有效的概念，如“退出-声音”、“纬度-纪律”等，注重社会学习的过程。因此，可能性论可能为被新自由主义和发展主义抛弃的公共领域和民间社会带来新的曙光。