权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Computer-Assisted Quantitative Comparison of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales

坎特伯雷故事集亨沃特和埃尔斯米尔手稿的计算机辅助定量比较

基本信息

批准号：
12610494
负责人：
NAKAO Yoshiyuki
金额：
$ 1.41万
依托单位：
HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

What follows is an interim report of a computer-assisted comprehensive textual comparison between the Hengwrt Manuscript and the Ellesmere Manuscript of The Canterterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. The Hengwrt Manuscript is the oldest and therefore regarded as closest to Chaucer's original, and the Ellesmere Manuscript is the edited and revised version of the Hengwrt by the same scribe. Jimura, Nakao and Matsuo (1995) undertook a comparison of Blake's (1980) and Robinson's (1957) editions. The former edition is a faithful reconstruction of the Hengwrt Manuscript and the latter is primarily based on the Ellesmere. Our report is a sequel to Jimura, Nakao and Matsuo (1995), but here the objects of our comparison are manuscripts themselves.Our basic method in this study is to compare the two manuscripts line by line, and then to compare them word by word within pairs of "the same lines." In order to perform this kind of comparison, it is first necessary for us to make pairs of corresponding lines, taking one from the Hengwrt and the other from the Ellesmere. To make each line correspond to the other line, we need to make a machine readable text. In this study we have obtained permission to use the machine readable text, The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile (ed. Estelle Stubbs, 2000).In "Lines with Different Word Forms" of the present book, we have listed all pairs of lines which contain one or more word differences. For each pair, the upper line shows the Hengwrt Manuscript and the lower line the Ellesmere.We hope that this study will contribute to the text criticism of Chaucer and thus to a better recontruction of his own language and text.

以下是一份关于杰弗里·乔叟的《坎特伯雷故事集》中的亨格瑞特和埃尔斯米尔的文本比较的中期报告。Hengwrt手稿是最古老的，因此被认为最接近乔叟的原作，而Ellesmere手稿是由同一抄写员编辑和修订的Hengwrt版本。Jimura，Nakao and Matsuo（1995）对Blake（1980）和罗宾逊（1957）的版本进行了比较。前一个版本是一个忠实的Hengwrt Mandalpt重建和后者主要是基于埃尔斯米尔。本报告是Jimura，Nakao and Matsuo（1995）的续篇，但这里的比较对象是手稿本身，我们的基本方法是逐行比较两份手稿，然后在“同行”内逐字比较。“为了进行这种比较，我们首先有必要制作成对的对应线，一条来自Hengwrt，另一条来自Ellesmere。为了使每一行与另一行相对应，我们需要制作一个机器可读的文本。在本研究中，我们获得了使用机器可读文本的许可，The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facebooks（ed. Estelle Stubbs，2000）。在本书的“具有不同单词形式的行”中，我们列出了所有包含一个或多个单词差异的行对。我们希望通过对这两个文本的分析，有助于乔叟的文本批评，从而更好地再现他自己的语言和文本。