权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A study of the comparative constitution law on the human rights of homeless people and autonomy support for homeless people

无家可归者人权与无家可归者自治支持的比较宪法研究

基本信息

批准号：
12620022
负责人：
SASANUMA Hiroshi
金额：
$ 2.56万
依托单位：
Shizuoka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12620022/
关键词：
homeless people human rights Japanese Constitution Daily Assistance Law Comparative Constitution Study housing social exclusion Homeless Autonomy Support Law ホームレス自立支援生活保護公的扶助

项目摘要

The subject of this research is to explore the better way of support autonomy of the homeless people and the human rights of the homeless people through a study of the comparative constitution lawThe heart of the homeless problem is the social exclusion. In Japan, after the collapse of the "bubble economy", the number of homeless people increased. But the Japanese government and local, authority not only had not try to take effective measures to cope with the homeless problem, but had tried to exclude the homeless people from the road. The Japanese constitution guarantees right to existence to all the people. And the Daily assistance law establishes the principle of the indiscriminate equality of daily assistance. But welfare offices did not give daily assistance to the homeless people, because the homeless people have no home to live. The famous case. of Hayashi, who was a day laborer in Nagoya city, was the first case whether the homeless people who can work have right to daily assistance. In 1996 the Nagoya District Court decided that even homeless people have right to daily assistance, then the Nagoya High Court and Supreme Court did not deny this obvious principleThe autonomy support law for Homeless people enacted in 2402 provides that the government and local authorities have to secure stable housing and safe jobs. But the government and local authorities are negative toward the execution of the support plan

本研究的主题是通过对比较宪法的研究，探索更好的支持流浪人员自主性和流浪人员人权的途径。流浪人员问题的核心是社会排斥。在日本，“泡沫经济”崩溃后，无家可归者的数量增加了。但日本政府和地方当局不仅没有采取有效措施来应对无家可归者问题，反而试图将无家可归者排除在道路之外。日本宪法保障所有人的生存权。《生活救助法》确立了生活救助不分青红皂白的平等原则。但是福利机构并没有给无家可归的人提供日常的帮助，因为无家可归的人没有家住。著名的案例。Hayashi是名古屋市的一名临时工，这是第一个可以工作的无家可归者是否有权获得日常援助的案例。1996年，名古屋地方法院裁定，即使是无家可归的人也有权获得日常援助，然后名古屋高等法院和最高法院也没有否认这一明显的原则。1924年颁布的《无家可归者自治支持法》规定，政府和地方当局必须确保稳定的住房和安全的工作。但是政府和地方自治团体对支援计划的执行持否定态度