A Preliminary Study of Writing Strategies Used by Japanese EFL Students: For Process-oriented English Writing Instruction

日本英语学生写作策略的初步研究：面向过程的英语写作教学

• 批准号: 12680281
• 负责人: HIROSE Keiko
• 金额: $ 1.41万
• 依托单位: Aichi Prefectural University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2002
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12680281/
• 关键词: Writing Process; Writings Strategies; Protocol Analysis; Argumentative Writing; English Writing Instruction; Japanese Learners of English; L1 Writing; L2 Writing; ポーズ; 内観報告; プランニング; プロトコル; 書くプロセス; 説得文; 説得スキーマ; 続み手意識

The relationship between first language (L1) and second language (L2) writing has attracted the attention of L2 writing researchers. Recent studies have pointed to not only differences but also similarities between L1 and L2 writing. The present study first compared L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of two groups of Japanese EFL students with differing English proficiency levels. The study made within-subject comparisons of L1 and L2 compositions in terms of organizational patterns, organization scores, overall quality and organization-planning processes. The results revealed that a majority of students employed deductive type organizational patterns in both L1 and L2, thus dispelling stereotypes about Japanese writers' rhetoric; and L2 organization scores were not significantly correlated with L1 organization scores. Secondly, the study compared L2 writing processes with L1 writing processes based on the students' recall protocols. Based on the results of … More the protocol analysis, the two groups' L1 and L2 writing processes were compared within the respective groups, and between the groups. The results of intra-group comparison indicated that the lower-proficiency group showed differences in L1 and L2 writing processes, but the higher-proficiency group did not differ much in terms of the type and frequency of strategies use in the two languages. The results of inter-group comparison found that both groups employed similar writing strategies, whereas each group also resorted to strategies not so frequently used by the other group, in both L1 and L2 writing. An in-depth analysis of protocols revealed that L2 writing processes of the two groups were different even when they employed the same strategy. The results of the present study suggest that students' L1 and L2 writing processes become more similar as their L2 proficiency develops. Finally, possible implications of the results are discussed as they pertain to writing research and pedagogy. Less

母语与二语写作之间的关系一直是二语写作研究者关注的焦点。近年来的研究表明，母语和二语写作既有差异，也有相似之处。本研究首先比较了两组英语水平不同的日本学生在议论文写作中的母语和二语组织模式。本研究从组织模式、组织得分、整体素质和组织规划过程四个方面对母语和二语作文进行了被试内比较。结果表明，大部分学生在第一语言和第二语言中都采用演绎型组织模式，从而消除了对日本作家修辞的刻板印象;第二语言组织分数与第一语言组织分数没有显著相关。其次，本研究根据学生的回忆协议，比较了二语和母语写作过程。结果的基础上 ...更多信息 通过协议分析，比较两组学生在组内和组间的L1和L2写作过程。组内比较的结果表明，低水平组在母语和二语写作过程中表现出差异，而高水平组在两种语言中策略使用的类型和频率上差异不大。组间比较的结果发现，两组学生在第一语言和第二语言写作中使用了相似的写作策略，但两组学生也使用了另一组学生不常用的写作策略。对实验方案的深入分析表明，即使使用相同的策略，两组学生的二语写作过程也是不同的。本研究的结果表明，随着学生二语水平的提高，他们的母语和二语写作过程变得越来越相似。最后，可能的影响的结果进行了讨论，因为它们涉及到写作研究和教学。少

项目成果

広瀬 恵子: "日本人英語学習者の英語・日本語ライティングプロセスの比較-英語力上位群VS下位群"愛知県立大学大学院国際文化研究科論集. 4. 151-180 (2003)

广濑惠子：“日本英语学习者的英语和日语写作过程的比较 - 英语水平较高的组与英语水平较低的组”爱知县立大学国际研究学院，国际研究学院杂志4. 151-180。 (2003)

Hirose, Keiko: "Comparing L1 and L2 writing processes of advanced Japanese EFL students"愛知県立大学外国語学部紀要(言語・文学編). 35. 1-36 (2003)

Hirose, Keiko：“日本高级英语学生的 L1 和 L2 写作过程的比较”爱知县立大学外国语学院通报（语言文学版）35. 1-36（2003）。

Hirose, Keiko: "Persuasive writing in L1 and L2:A look at Japanese EFL students' rhetorical organization strategies"JACET Bulletin. 33. 43-56 (2001)

Hirose, Keiko：“L1 和 L2 中的说服性写作：日本 EFL 学生的修辞组织策略”JACET 公告。

Hirose, Keiko: "Comparing L1 and L2 writing processes of novice Japanese EFL writers"Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan. 13. 101-110 (2002)

Hirose, Keiko：“日本新手 EFL 作家的 L1 和 L2 写作过程的比较”日本英语语言教育年度评论。

Hirose Keiko.: "Comparing L1 and L2 writing processes of advanced Japanese EFL students: An exploratory study"The Journal of the Faculty of Foreign Studies, Aichi Prefectural University (Langrage and Literature). 35. 1-36 (2003)

广濑惠子：“日本高级英语学生的 L1 和 L2 写作过程的比较：一项探索性研究”爱知县立大学外国语学院学报（语言和文学）。