The Discourse of "Nation"alization in Modem East Asia and Confucian Embodiment -From a Comparative Perspective

近代东亚“民族”化话语及其儒家体现——比较视角

• 批准号: 13610045
• 负责人: NAKAMURA Shunsaku
• 金额: $ 1.54万
• 依托单位: HIROSHIMA UNIVERSIlY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2001 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-13610045/
• 关键词: Nation-State; Intelligentsia; Confucianism; Theoretical Thoughts on Asia; Representation; 国民国家論

How "nation states" were founded in modern East Asia, how, through that process, "Confucianism" as a traditional learning shared in the past was negated on one hand, and was reorganized, on the other, as a modem learning was elucidated from the viewpoint of embodiment of modem "nations (peoples)" and regeneration and mobilization of Confucianism, with intellectuals' discourse as material. The results of the study were published in such books and monographs as "Confucianism in the Edo Period and Modern 'Wisdom'", "Significance of East Asian Modern Philosophy" and others.Research trips were made in this study period not only domestically but four trips were made to Taiwan and once to Singapore to collect materials, in which graphic reality of "the nation" being formed was directly experienced. This enabled the acquisition of the most fresh and latest information for research. The results were orally presented at some international symposia held in Beijing, Korea and Nagoya so as to pursu … More e the common understanding on the issues among the fellow researchers who study East Asia.To analyze from the perspectives of history and history of thoughts the formative process of 'nation states' in modem East Asia and to anatomically articulate the modernity which resides within our "way of viewing things" would be an important step for breakthrough for us confronted with rivalry between globalization on one hand and nationalism and regionalism on the other. 'Nation' having been obtained as self-identity since 19th century is now questioned its effectiveness, but there has been nothing yet that transcends it. It is against this backdrop that conflicts have emerged between globalization and nationalism.Further research needs were inspired to historically and comparatively study how the formative process of such "intellectual wisdom (academic wisdom)" as "philosophy" and "study of history of thoughts" has been intertwined with that of self-image in modem East Asia where the former served as an academic foundation for the latter. Less

近代东亚“民族国家”是如何建立的，在这个过程中，“儒家”作为过去的传统学术如何被否定，又如何被重新组织，成为现代学术。以知识分子的话语为材料，从现代“民族（人民）”的体现和儒家思想的再生与动员的角度来阐释。研究成果发表在《江户时代的儒学与现代“智慧”》、《东亚现代哲学的意义》等书和专著中。在这一研究期间，不仅在国内进行了研究旅行，而且还四次前往台湾和一次前往新加坡收集资料，直接体验了“国家”正在形成的形象现实。这使得能够获得最新和最新的研究信息。在北京、韩国、名古屋等地举行的国际研讨会上作了口头报告， ...更多信息 从历史和思想史的角度分析近代东亚“民族国家”的形成过程，解剖性地阐明存在于我们“看待事物的方式”中的现代性将是我们在全球化与民族主义、地区主义的对抗中取得突破的重要一步。自19世纪世纪以来作为自我认同获得的“民族”，其有效性受到质疑，正是在这样的背景下，全球化与民族主义之间的冲突出现了，这种“智性智慧”的形成过程，需要进一步的研究加以历史的、比较的考察作为“哲学”和“思想史研究”的“学术智慧”，与近代东亚的自我形象研究交织在一起，并为后者提供了学术基础。少

项目成果

中村春作: "「脱亜」と「合邦」-「アジア主義」の発生-"別冊・プロブレマティーク. 1. 55-70 (2002)

Shunsaku Nakamura：“‘去亚洲’和‘统一’——‘亚洲主义’的出现——”单独卷/Problematique（2002）。

中村 春作: "大坂の学藝と徂徠学"日本思想史学. 34. 16-23 (2002)

中村俊作：《大阪的学术艺术与空莱研究》《日本思想史》34. 16-23 (2002)。

中村 春作: "江戸儒教と近代の「知」"ぺりかん社. 275 (2002)

中村俊作：“江户儒学与现代‘知识’”Perikansha 275 (2002)。

加地伸行: "儒教の本"学習研究社. 1-224 (2001)

梶伸之：《儒学》学州研究社 1-224 (2001)。

中村春作: "一九三〇年代日本における「国民」化の言説と儒教、そして中国"季刊日本思想史. 59. 69-84 (2001)

中村俊作：“关于 1930 年代日本‘国民’的论述、儒家思想和中国”《日本思想史季刊》59. 69-84 (2001)。