The Synthetic Research on the Philosophy of the Other

在整个西方和东方哲学史上，我们都对“他者之他者”的思想进行了大规模的反思。因此，我们得到了两个重要的结果：1)通过对维特根斯坦的《逻辑哲学论》的详细研究，我们得到了区别于现象他者的意义外的他者的概念。在Tractatus看来，现象的他者在日常语言的逻辑空间中是没有问题的，但它不能在现代哲学传统中的他者的主观主义理论的框架内构成。“意义外的他者”具有名副其实的“他者”，它是另一种逻辑空间的主体，是在我的逻辑空间内无法理解、无法言说、无法呈现的“他者”。2)在公共哲学领域，我们获得了一个“自我他者-公共世界”的新视角，只有我们才能敞开心扉去理解“意义外的他者”并继续去理解它。这一视角既有现代性中的“自我他者-公共世界”的民族主义视角，也有作为民族主义否定的“自我他者-公共世界”的单一文化视角。我们的新视角是响应性和多维性的，具有多元文化主义和世界主义的互补观点。

We made a large scale of reconsideration on the ideas of the "Otherness of the Other" throughout the history of philosophy both of the West and of the East. In consequence, we got two important results like follows;1)By the detailed studies of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, we got the notion of the "Other outside the meaning" which is distinguished from the "phenomenal Other". From the viewpoint of Tractatus, the phenomenal Other can be without problem in the logical space of ordinary language, while it could not be constituted within the framework of subjectivistic theory of "Otherness" in the tradition of modern philosophy. The"Other outside the meaning" has a veritable "Otherness" as the subject of another logical space and as the "Other" which is ununderstandable, unspeakable and unpresentable within my logical space.2)In the field of public philosophy, we got a new perspective of "Self-Other-Public World" by which only we can be open to the "Other outside the meaning" and continue to try to understand it. This perspective is distinct both form the nationalistic perspective of "Self-Other -Public World" in the modernity and from the monocultural perspective of " Self-Other-Public World" which is only a negative of the nationalistic one. Our new perspective is responsive and multidimensional and has complementary viewpoints of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism