Basic research of a critical social theory based on "pluralistic- ontology"

本研究旨在构建一种基于“多元本体论”的新的社会理论，该理论认为许多社会关系是通过多个存在维度的中介来构建的。社会伦理的问题往往被这一点抓住，马克思社会理论被扭曲的历史主义倾向于同时被征服。2002财年，在道德行为理论方面，阿伦特的思想被审查，并发表了论文《H·阿伦特和她的公共领域思想》。2003财年，虽然对韦伯思想的多元社会理论进行了考察，获得了论文写作的观点，但发现他的认识论立场存在问题，计划改变了。这一年，撰写了《如何将人与文化作为一种方法来思考》的论文，在多元本体论的主题下阐释了对文化的基本理解。在2004财政年度，撰写了两篇论文。首先，在《为什么重新认可汉娜·阿伦特的思想》一文中对阿伦特和马克思的思想进行了比较考察。粗略地说明了对她思想的评价的基本观点。其次，撰写了《马克斯·韦伯的价值自由理论及其世界观的前提--从多元本体论的角度进行阐释》一文。本文是从“多元本体论”的角度对韦伯的“世界理解结构观”进行解读的一次尝试，是整个研究设计的基础。把韦伯的理论作为一个整体来对待的持续研究的加强是可以假定的。先前计划构建一个继承了马克思、韦伯、哈特曼、波普尔和阿伦特思想的多元本体论社会理论的计划，还需要更多的时间。虽然现在有信心，这项研究计划的部署前景是明确的。

This research aims at compose a new social theory based on "pluralistic-ontology", an understanding that many social relations are constructed through mediation of many existence dimensions. Problems of social ethics tend to be caught by this, and the historicism by which Marxian social theory have been distorted tend to be conquered simultaneously.The 2002 fiscal year, with respect to the ethical-act theory, Arendt's thought was examined and the paper "H.Ahrendt and her thought of the public sphere". In the 2003 fiscal year, although examination of the pluralistic-social-theory of Weber's thought was performed and the view of paper writing was obtained, but a problem was found about his epistemological stand and the plan was changed. In this year, the paper "How to consider about <Human being and culture as a method>" was written, which explained fundamental understanding of culture in a motif of the pluralistic-ontology. In the 2004 fiscal year, two papers were written. First, comparative examination of Arendt's and Marx's thought was performed in the paper "Why the thought of Hannah Arendt is reapproved". The basic points of evaluation of her thought was illustrated roughly. Second, the paper " Max Weber's value-freedom theory and the premises of its view-of-the-world -An explication from a viewpoint of `pluralistic ontology'- " was written. This paper is a trial which decodes the Weber's 'view-of the-world-comprehension structure' from the viewpoint of 'pluralistic-ontology' and is considered as a foundation of this whole research design. An enhancement of continuous research is to be assumed which treats Weber's theory as a whole. The previous planned design to construct a comprehensive pluralistic-ontological social theory that inherited the thoughts of Marx, Weber, Hartmann, Popper, and Arendt, requires time still more. Although now it is self confident that the clear prospect to deployment of this research program was acquired.