权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Comparative Study of 'Nationalism' and 'Essentialism' in Archaeological Representation

考古表现中“民族主义”与“本质主义”的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
15320079
负责人：
YOGO Takuma
金额：
$ 4.86万
依托单位：
Waseda University (2005)Jichi Medical University (2003-2004)
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. Collecting data and Analyses:(1) All investigators collected and referenced published matters and studies deal with the archaeological data such 'essentialism' or 'nationalism', additionally, analyzed the discourses of the past in their fields.(2) TANIGAWA and TAKANASHI, O (Amami museum) organized their Nansei Shoto area materials, and revealed many archaeological problems caused by the boundary recognitions of past researchers. (3) SASAKI, M (Waseda University Honjo Senior High School) connected with korean experts, and clarified Japan-Korea differences of historical perception about past people and technology exchanges. (4) YOGO and OGAWA made firsthand observations about ideas of cultural policies and the status of archaeological sites as tourism resources in southeast asia (Philippines, Indonesia). (5) TERASAKI conducted field surveys in Honduras and Guatemala, As a result, demonstrated the close connection between rights of indigenous peoples and values of cultural heritages.2. Workshops:The collaboration workshops were held 11 times in Tokyo, Amami-oshima, Fukuoka, and Manila (Philippines). The topic of the workshops were about such as "Afterimage of Wildness-Ideological Magnetic Field on the Past", "Symbol of Indigenous Cultural Heritage/Resource in Central America", "Recent Criticized Points in Japanese Archaeology", "Archaeological methodology and representational activity", "Cultural heritage and Archaeology in Modern Japan", "Differences of Historical Consciousness between Ryukyu and Amami", "Remarkable Transition of JOMON Period Images" and "Reconsideration the Relationship between Modern Philippines Archaeology and National Identity".Then investigators analyzed local characteristics and problems in archaeological activities, and make suggestions on how to offer solutions on issues concerning in their fields.

1.资料收集与分析：（1）研究者收集并参考了相关文献，并对“本质主义”、“民族主义”等考古学资料进行了整理，同时对各自领域内的历史话语进行了分析。(2)谷川和高梨（奄美博物馆）整理了他们的南西诸岛地区资料，揭示了过去研究人员边界划分所造成的许多考古学问题。(3)SASAKI，M（早稻田大学本庄高级中学）与韩国专家进行了交流，澄清了日韩两国对过去的人和技术交流的历史认知差异。(4)YOGO和OGAWA对东南亚（菲律宾、印度尼西亚）的文化政策理念和考古遗址作为旅游资源的地位进行了第一手观察。(5)寺崎在洪都拉斯和危地马拉进行了实地调查，结果表明土著人民的权利与文化遗产价值观之间的密切联系。讲习班：在东京、奄美大岛、福冈和马尼拉（菲律宾）举办了11次合作讲习班。研讨会的主题是“荒野的余像-过去的意识形态磁场”、“中美洲土著文化遗产/资源的象征”、“日本考古学的近期批评点”、“考古学方法和代表性活动”、“现代日本的文化遗产和考古学”、“琉球和奄美之间历史意识的差异”、“JOMON时期形象的显著转变”和“现代菲律宾考古学与国家认同关系的再思考”。然后，调查人员分析了当地的特点和考古活动中存在的问题，并就如何解决各自领域的问题提出了建议。