The Imported University-Industry Technology Transfer Scheme from the U.S. and its Adjustment to Japanese Universities

美国引进的大学产业技术转移计划及其对日本大学的调整

• 批准号: 17530615
• 负责人: FUJITSUKA Tomokazu
• 金额: $ 1.2万
• 依托单位: University of Miyazaki
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17530615/
• 关键词: Higher Education; University-Industry Technology Transfer

Mitigation of regulations concerning intellectual property and intermediary organizations for university-industry technology transfer (UITT) are the primary features of the American model of UITT. The policies of the Japanese government that encouraged the adaptation of the American model in the 1990's emphasized UITT in the form of patents but did not necessary place importance on the transfer of knowledge concerning know-how or on inter-personnel interaction, in spite of the fact that the principal issue concerning reform in America was the revitalization of information exchange via liaison activities.It has become clear that it was the large universities that actively applied UITT policy that emphasized patent management, whereas the small universities prioritized interaction with regional industries. The differences in attitudes toward the adaptation of the American model are influenced by financial status, size of the research organization, level of past experience with UITT, and … More the technological capabilities of regional industries. In other words, one may consider this the result of the diverse strategies adopted by each university in response to the various conditions that affected them.The differences between small and large universities was even more distinct in Canada, where, in contrast to the large universities which exist as the birthplaces of a multiplicity of university-originated ventures, small universities demonstrated a much stronger and more exclusive interest in enhancing the consciousness of their faculty and interacting with regional industries. The fact that designated leaders had long retained powers that were highly influential in directing the design of internal systems sheds further light on strategic differences.This research is distinguished by its focus on the development of university technology transfer units from a strategic management perspective. For this reason, a great diversity is recognized between institutions as regards their respective organizational structures and methods of UITT. Less

美国大学-产业技术转移模式的主要特点是对知识产权和大学-产业技术转移中介组织的管制有所放松。日本政府在20世纪90年代鼓励采用美国模式的政策中，强调了专利形式的知识产权，但并不一定重视专有技术的知识转让或人员之间的相互作用，尽管有关美国改革的主要问题是通过联络活动恢复信息交流，但很明显，主要是大型大学积极实施注重专利管理的知识产权技术政策，而小型大学则优先考虑与区域产业的互动。对美国模式的适应态度的差异受财务状况，研究组织的规模，过去的经验水平， ...更多信息 区域产业的技术能力。换句话说，可以认为这是每个大学针对影响它们的各种条件采取不同战略的结果。在加拿大，小型和大型大学之间的差异甚至更加明显，与作为多种大学起源企业的发源地而存在的大型大学相比，小型大学在提高教师的意识和与区域产业互动方面表现出更强烈和更排他性的兴趣。事实上，指定的领导人长期保留的权力，是非常有影响力的，在指导内部制度的设计，进一步揭示了战略差异。本研究的特点是它的重点是从战略管理的角度来看，大学技术转让单位的发展。因此，人们认识到，各机构在其各自的组织结构和能力建设培训方法方面存在很大差异。少