权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study on the legal structure of freedom of private school and public aid to private school in Europe

欧洲私立学校自由的法律结构及对私立学校公共援助的研究

基本信息

批准号：
18530644
负责人：
YUKI Makoto
金额：
$ 1.56万
依托单位：
National Institute for Educational Policy Research
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2006 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The positive importance of private school existence is found in distinctiveness which differs from national and public schools in educational quality. However, for that occasion, how should private school be treated in educational policy and how should it be established legislatively in educational law.Within current legal system, private schools have "freedom of private school (Privatschulfreiheit)". The question is whether this freedom includes "freedom of education in private school" and "freedom of Tendenzbetrieb" as well as "freedom of establishing schools". Besides, why private schools are highly rated and public funds are used, in most liberal democratic countries. In regard to this case, is the aid from the public funds of those countries the same kind as that of Japan which government agencies have great discretionary powers. Alternatively, as noted in the resolution of Europe congress (1984), does it rather belong to national obligation as something which provides the practical and financial foundation to raison d'etre or social and public roles of private school, which derived from systemic safeguards of private school and legal protection of "freedom of private school". Furthermore, to what extent and degree, does the aid include public control. It'd be the matter of strained relations with "freedom of private school".Therefore, this research introduces theoretical rationalization on the importance of private school existence, "freedom of private school" and furthermore, public sphere of private school with comparative jurisprudence approach. In response, I examined legislative situation regarding freedom of private school and public aid in six countries, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Belgium, Spain, and Norway, especially Netherlands which is private school-dominated country, from school jurisprudential perspective. Eventually, I compile a report and published it.

民办学校存在的积极意义在于其教育质量与国立学校和公立学校的区别。然而，在这种情况下，私立学校在教育政策上应如何对待，在教育法上应如何立法确立。在现行法律制度下，私立学校享有“私立学校自由”（Privatschulfreiheit）。问题是这种自由是否包括“私立学校教育的自由”和“倾向性教育的自由”以及“建校的自由”。此外，为什么在大多数自由民主国家，私立学校的评价很高，而公共资金被使用。在这种情况下，这些国家的公共资金援助是否与日本的援助相同？日本的政府机构有很大的自由裁量权。或者，正如欧洲大会（1984年）的决议所指出的那样，它是否更属于国家义务，因为它为私立学校的存在理由或社会和公共作用提供了实践和财政基础，这源于私立学校的系统保障和“私立学校自由”的法律保护。此外，在何种程度和程度上，援助包括公共控制。这将是与“私立学校自由”关系紧张的问题。因此，本研究运用比较法学的方法对私立学校存在的重要性、“私立学校的自由”以及私立学校的公共领域进行了理论合理化。对此，我从学校法学的角度考察了荷兰、德国、丹麦、比利时、西班牙、挪威六个国家关于私立学校自由和公共援助的立法现状，尤其是私立学校占主导地位的荷兰。最后，我编写了一份报告并发表了。