Study on the legal structure of freedom of private school and public aid to private school in Europe

私立学校存在的积极意义在于其教育质量与国立和公立学校不同。然而，在这种情况下，民办学校在教育政策上应如何对待，在教育法上应如何立法确立，在现行法律的体系下，民办学校享有“民办学校自由"。问题是，这种自由是否包括“私立学校教育自由”和“Tendenetrieb自由”以及“建立学校的自由”。此外，为什么私立学校的评价很高，公共资金被使用，在大多数自由民主国家。在这种情况下，那些国家的公共资金援助是否与日本政府机构拥有很大自由裁量权的援助相同？另一方面，正如欧洲议会（1984年）决议所指出的那样，它是否属于国家义务，是为私立学校的存在理由或社会和公共作用提供实际和财政基础的东西，它源于对私立学校的制度保障和对“私立学校自由”的法律的保护。此外，援助在多大程度上和程度上包括公共控制。因此，本研究以比较法学的方法，对私立学校存在的重要性、私立学校的“自由”以及私立学校的“公共领域”，进行理论上的合理化。作为回应，我从学校审慎的角度考察了荷兰、德国、丹麦、比利时、西班牙和挪威六个国家关于私立学校自由和公共资助的立法情况，特别是荷兰，这是私立学校占主导地位的国家。最后，我写了一份报告并发表了。

The positive importance of private school existence is found in distinctiveness which differs from national and public schools in educational quality. However, for that occasion, how should private school be treated in educational policy and how should it be established legislatively in educational law.Within current legal system, private schools have "freedom of private school (Privatschulfreiheit)". The question is whether this freedom includes "freedom of education in private school" and "freedom of Tendenzbetrieb" as well as "freedom of establishing schools". Besides, why private schools are highly rated and public funds are used, in most liberal democratic countries. In regard to this case, is the aid from the public funds of those countries the same kind as that of Japan which government agencies have great discretionary powers. Alternatively, as noted in the resolution of Europe congress (1984), does it rather belong to national obligation as something which provides the practical and financial foundation to raison d'etre or social and public roles of private school, which derived from systemic safeguards of private school and legal protection of "freedom of private school". Furthermore, to what extent and degree, does the aid include public control. It'd be the matter of strained relations with "freedom of private school".Therefore, this research introduces theoretical rationalization on the importance of private school existence, "freedom of private school" and furthermore, public sphere of private school with comparative jurisprudence approach. In response, I examined legislative situation regarding freedom of private school and public aid in six countries, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Belgium, Spain, and Norway, especially Netherlands which is private school-dominated country, from school jurisprudential perspective. Eventually, I compile a report and published it.