Reconstruction of Administration of Property

在日本，信托没有被用作管理他人财产的有效手段，尽管要求管理老年人的财产或灵活继承遗产。其中一个原因是说信托的法律结构与日本民法中的财产概念不一致。因此，本研究聚焦于信托是否真的与财产概念相矛盾的问题。为了知道信托是否与日本法律中从财产推导出来的原则不一致，我们回顾了财产概念的历史，其原则的意义，以及它们今天的范围。同时，我们将信托与委托、代理进行了比较，明确了信托的特征，因为信托也是用来管理他人财产的。

Trust isn't used in Japan as an efficient means to administrate the property of others, even though the management the property of old persons or the flexible succession of estate is demanded. One of the reasons is said that trust has the legal structure that is not consistent with the conception of property in Japanese civil law. This research therefore focused upon the question if the trust is really contradicting to the conception of property. To know if the trust is inconsistent to the principles deduced from property in Japanese law, we have looked into the history of the conception of property, the significance of its principles, and their range today. At the same time, we compared trust with mandate and agency to make it clear the characteristics of trust, because these two are used also to administrate the property of others.