The basho theoretical inquiry into the metaphysical problems of mind

为什么作为物质的大脑会产生物质所没有的精神？物质和精神是如何相互作用的？作为主体性核心的“我”何以存在？我们的意志是被决定的还是自由的？这类问题在哲学史上一直被当作形而上学的问题来争论，本研究试图追溯那些对立概念的起源条件，试图使这些问题本身无效，而不是试图使那些概念之间的概念发展成为桥梁。然后，我们将西田的巴绍理论应用于这种将现实视为无限而将概念视为现实的限制的审判。通过这种方式，我们已经探究了我们的概念装置的应用的有用性和局限性。

Why brain as material produces mind whose quality doesn't exist in material? How can mind and material interact each others? Why "I" as a core of subjectivity have come to existence? Is our will determined or is it free? Such questions have been argued as metaphisical problems in the history of philosophy.This reserach has tried to retrospect to the conditions which have sustained those opposite concepts from the beginning and tried to make those probrems themselves invalid, instead of making out conceptual devicies which bridge those concepts. Then, we have applied Nishida's basho theory to that trial which regards reality as the unlimited and regards concepts as limitations of reality, on the contrary. In this way, we have inquired into the usefulness and the limits of applications of our conceptual devices.