The basho theoretical inquiry into the metaphysical problems of mind

为什么大脑作为物质产生了精神，而精神的性质是物质不存在的？心灵和物质如何相互作用？为什么“我”作为主体性的核心而存在？我们的意志是坚定的还是自由的？这些问题在哲学史上一直被认为是形而上学的问题。本研究试图回顾那些从一开始就支撑着这些对立概念的条件，并试图使这些问题本身无效，而不是寻找连接这些概念的概念工具。然后，我们将西田的basho理论应用于将现实视为无限、将概念视为现实的局限性的审判中。通过这种方式，我们探讨了我们的概念装置的用途和应用的局限性。

Why brain as material produces mind whose quality doesn't exist in material? How can mind and material interact each others? Why "I" as a core of subjectivity have come to existence? Is our will determined or is it free? Such questions have been argued as metaphisical problems in the history of philosophy.This reserach has tried to retrospect to the conditions which have sustained those opposite concepts from the beginning and tried to make those probrems themselves invalid, instead of making out conceptual devicies which bridge those concepts. Then, we have applied Nishida's basho theory to that trial which regards reality as the unlimited and regards concepts as limitations of reality, on the contrary. In this way, we have inquired into the usefulness and the limits of applications of our conceptual devices.