Explorations into a Top-Down Approach to the Copy Theory of Movement

作为一个有前途的替代自下而上的方法来构建句子结构，我已经进行了调查，自上而下的方法和乔姆斯基的最低限度的框架。在初步调查重建对A运动的影响后（参见。Terada（2010 a，B）），Terada（2011）论文，"约束条件（A）和（C）适用于何处？（sokubaku joken（A）to（C）wa dokode tekiyo sareruka）"从自上而下的角度讨论了Noam Chomsky（1981）的绑定理论的应用时机问题，为大卫·勒博（David Lebeaux）（2009）的论点提供了论据，即绑定条件（A）最好被分析为"任何地方条件"，而绑定条件（C）是"任何地方"条件。根据他的论文，在一个句子的推导过程中，条件（A）必须至少满足一次，在一个句子的推导过程中，条件（C）必须不被违反，在一个句子中，条件（A）是反身代词或互反代词。 ...更多信息 涉及到推理表达。基于这一结论，我在2012年的论文《论重构策略》（Sikochiku sutorateji ni tsuite）中讨论了Leddon（2006）所观察到的成人语法和儿童语法对A-杠运动现象的重构效果的差异。当一个含有指称表达（如专有名词）的疑问名词短语被移过一个与r-表达共同索引的代词时，重构效应是可用的。我已经表明，缺乏重建效果的儿童的语法和语法的日本学习者的英语是解释在自上而下的方法直截了当，声称他们依赖于一定的重建策略，这有利于形成后重建的逻辑结构。这一分析在我2013年的论文《中介语的相对化：派生与重构（Chukan-gengo niokeru Kankeisetsu no Hasei to Saikochiku）》中得到了进一步的证实。在本文中，它是观察到，英语本族语者和日本英语学习者产生不同的配置在重建配置的背景下。作者已经表明，在这项调查中提出的自上而下的方法提供了一个直接的解释所观察到的事实。少

As a promising alternative to a bottom-up approach to sentence structure building, I have conducted an investigation into a top-down approach and within Chomsky’s minimalist framework. After preliminary surveys of reconstruction effects on A-movement (cf. Terada (2010a, b)), Terada’s (2011) paper, “Where do the Binding Conditions (A) and (C) apply? (sokubaku joken (A) to (C) wa dokode tekiyo sareruka),” has discussed the issue of timing of the application of Noam Chomsky’s (1981) Binding Theory from the top-down perspective, providing an argument for David Lebeaux’s (2009) thesis that Binding Condition (A) is best analyzed as an “anywhere condition” and that Binding Condition (C) is an “everywhere” condition. According to his thesis, Condition (A) must be satisfied at least once during the derivation of a sentence in which an anaphor (i.e. either a reflexive or reciprocal pronoun) is introduced and Condition (C) must not be violated at any point of derivation of a sentence in which a r … More eferential expression is involved. Based on this conclusion, my 2012 paper, “On Reconstruction Strategies (Sikochiku sutorateji ni tsuite),” has discussed differences in reconstruction effects on A-bar movement phenomena between adult grammar and child grammar observed by Leddon (2006). Reconstruction effects are available when an interrogative noun phrase containing referential expressions (such as proper nouns) is moved across a pronoun with which the r-expression is co-indexed toward the sentence-initial position. I have shown that the lack of reconstruction effects in child’s grammar and the grammar of Japanese learners of English is explained in the top-down approach straightforwardly, by claiming that they rely on a certain reconstruction strategy which facilitates the formation of after-reconstruction logical structure. This analysis is further confirmed in my 2013 paper, “Relativization in Interlanguage: Derivation and Reconstruction (Chukan-gengo niokeru Kankeisetsu no Hasei to Saikochiku)”. In this paper, it is observed that native speakers of English and Japanese learners of English yield different configurations in the context of reconstruction configurations. The author has shown that the top-down approach proposed in this investigation provides a straightforward account for the observed facts. Less