Comparative and General Research on the Legal Doctrines Conditioning Fundamental Rights Restriction on "Security"-Purpose

这项研究的目的是具体说明法律理论和标准，以确定对公民基本权利的合乎宪法的限制，特别是为了保障公民生命的“安全”。其结果是，如果比例原则不是作为价值比较机制，而是主要作为目的-效果关系立法评估的制约机制来实践，那么比例原则就表现为宪法审查的主导机制。因此，比例原则只有在与限制合法立法目的的标准同时使用时才有效。试图建立定义非法目的的“绝对规则”的理论只适用于这种语境，因为它们都不可能真正发挥“绝对”的作用。

This research has aimed at specifying legal doctrines and criterion that serve as defining constitutionally justified restriction on fundamental rights of citizens, especially for the purpose of guaranteeing “security” of civil life. As its results, proportionality principle represents as leading mechanism for constitutional scrutiny if this principle is practiced not as mechanism of value-comparison, but chiefly as mechanism of checking legislative assessment of purpose-effect relationship. Proportionality principle is, therefore, only effective when it is used simultaneously with criterion limiting legitimate legislative purpose. Theories trying to establish “absolute rules” defining illegitimate purpose are only pragmatically suitable in this context, because none of them can function really “absolute”.