Comparison sociological study on environmental dispute and agreement formation around NIMBY

在一项环境社会学研究中，如果能安排一个地方，让持不同观点的利益相关者聚集在一起进行建设性的讨论，似乎是合理的，那么就有可能解决与冒险有关的冲突。事实上，在民主社会制度中，保证理性对话的程序已经得到完善，这一点在许多领域的环境争端中所取得的进展就证明了这一点。然而，这项研究澄清了为什么个别地区和整个社会之间的合作关系会恶化。如果在这一过程中，反对建设核设施的声音被压制，就很难认为这是解决矛盾的实际方法。

In an environmental sociological study, it seems plausible that if a place can be arranged where various stakeholders with different points of view can come together and hold a constructive discussion, it might be possible to resolve a conflict concerned with risk taking.Indeed, procedures that guarantee rational conversations have been refined within democratic social systems as demonstrated by the progress made in environmental disputes in many areas.However, this study clarified why the cooperative relationship between each individual region and society as a whole will deteriorate. If the voice of the people opposing the facility was suppressed through the process, the procedure can hardly be considered a practical method of solving the conflict.