权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Studies on Economic Structure and Policies of Transitional Ecomonies in Asia

亚洲转型经济体经济结构与政策比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
09553001
负责人：
MATSUMOTO Shuji
金额：
$ 7.55万
依托单位：
Ritsumeikan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

We have summarized the impacts of the financial and economic crisis of 1997 to transitional economies, NIES, and ASEAN countries in Asia as following, and we have pointed out the important role of Japan in the process to return to the stable economic growth of East Asian countries as following.1) Economists have pointed as main causes of crisis the problems in the economic structure of East Asian countries. However the international flow of short-term capital attacked the East Asian economies as strong as the problems within their economies. It worked stronger in some cases.2) We have made comparative studies of economic policies and economic performances among countries. We compared Thailand that accepted IMF descriptions with Malaysia, which introduced new regulations on international capital flow. We also compared Korea that was affected seriously by economic crisis with Taiwan, which was able to find the way to early recovery.3) Asian economic crisis has added difficulties in the transitional economies in Asia. However, there are big differences among countries. Vietnam has continued to follow Doi-Moi policy to enhance market economy, while North Korea encountered Asian economic crisis in the effort to find the way of economic reform and openness. Under the rule of military power Myanmar added one step to market economy by hosting of foreign capital from ASEAN countries.4) Japanese role has been making clearer through the Asian economic crisis. Japanese private capital investment in Asia has decreased, while the role of Japanese government becomes more important than before, for example, as the idea of New Miyazawa Fund.

1997年的金融危机对亚洲的转型经济体、NIES和东盟国家造成了如下影响，并指出日本在东亚各国经济恢复稳定增长的过程中发挥的重要作用。1）经济学家们指出，东亚各国的经济结构问题是危机的主要原因。然而，国际短期资本流动对东亚经济体的冲击与其经济体内部的问题一样强烈。2）我们对各国的经济政策和经济表现进行了比较研究。我们将接受IMF描述的泰国与引入国际资本流动新规定的马来西亚进行了比较。我们还比较了受经济危机影响严重的韩国和能够找到早期复苏之路的台湾。3）亚洲经济危机增加了亚洲转型经济体的困难。然而，各国之间存在很大差异。越南继续奉行经济革新政策，加强市场经济，朝鲜则在亚洲经济危机中寻求经济改革和开放之路。在军事强权统治下，缅甸通过吸收东盟国家的外资，向市场经济迈进了一步。4）日本的角色通过亚洲经济危机变得更加清晰。日本在亚洲的私人资本投资减少，而日本政府的作用变得比以前更重要，例如新宫泽基金的想法。