Protocol Review and Monitoring System
方案审查和监控系统
基本信息
- 批准号:10177900
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 6.56万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2018
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2018-05-01 至 2023-04-30
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:AdherenceBudgetsCancer CenterCancer Center Support GrantClinicalClinical ResearchClinical TrialsCommittee MembershipConduct Clinical TrialsCost AllocationDevelopmentDisciplineDiseaseEnrollmentEnsureFoundationsGoalsInstitutional PolicyInstitutional Review BoardsKnowledgeLeadershipMalignant NeoplasmsMedical ResearchMonitorOklahomaProcessProtocols documentationResearch PersonnelResearch PriorityResearch SupportResourcesReview CommitteeSiteSystemVotingauthoritybasecancer research center directordesignexperienceinvestigator-initiated trialmembermultidisciplinaryoperationpatient populationprogramsresearch study
项目摘要
PROTOCOL REVIEW AND MONITORING SYSTEM – ABSTRACT
The Protocol Review and Monitoring System (PRMS) oversees all cancer-related clinical research at the
Stephenson Cancer Center (SCC), including clinical research at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
(the SCC's proposed consortium partner), in order to ensure that it is of the highest scientific merit, adheres to
the strategic priorities of the SCC, demonstrates ongoing progress and efficiently utilizes SCC resources. The
PRMS conducts protocol review in a two-stage process. In stage one, Multidisciplinary Disease-Site
Committees (MDCs) initiate and/or review protocols (when disease-based) proposed by member investigators
in order to assess scientific merit, availability of relevant patient population, overlap with potentially competing
trials and whether protocols align with disease-site program goals. The MDC also assists investigators in the
development of investigator-initiated trials (IITs). The SCC's Budget and Operations Committee (BOC), which
is comprised of the leadership of the Clinical Trials Office (CTO) and SCC Administrative Core, reviews all new
institutional protocols to ensure effective CTO resource utilization, operational feasibility and appropriateness
of cost allocation. In stage two, the Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee (PRMC) conducts an
independent review of the protocol to assess scientific merit and design feasibility. The SCC Director has
delegated to the PRMC the institutional authority to open protocols that meet SCC standards for scientific merit
and scientific priorities and to terminate protocols that do not demonstrate scientific progress.
PRMC membership includes broad representation from multiple disciplines engaged in cancer clinical
research. Its 21 voting members are selected based on their disciplinary-specific knowledge, experience in
designing and conducting research studies, and/or specialized clinical expertise. Depending on trial type, the
PRMC performs either an expedited Administrative Review or Full Committee Review. If the latter, at least two
reviewers from the PRMC voting members are assigned to the protocol. A protocol is approved with a majority
vote of a quorum of members. PRMC review occurs prior to submission to the Institutional Review Board
(IRB), and per institutional policy the latter will not review cancer-related protocols until approved by the
PRMC. In 2016, the PRMC reviewed 114 new protocols. The PRMC also monitors active protocols annually for
ongoing accrual and has the authority to close protocols that do not demonstrate adequate scientific progress.
A focused process designed to enhance accrual to low enrolling trials is also part of the PRMC. In 2016, the
PRMC reviewed 73 active protocols for accrual progress. Of these, 41 were approved to continue, 27 were
required to submit Accrual Enhancement Plans, and five were closed due to low accrual.
方案审查和监测系统-摘要
方案审查和监测系统(PRMS)监督所有癌症相关的临床研究,
斯蒂芬森癌症中心(SCC),包括俄克拉荷马州医学研究基金会的临床研究
(the SCC的拟议财团合作伙伴),以确保其具有最高的科学价值,坚持
SCC的战略优先事项,展示持续的进展并有效地利用SCC资源。的
PRMS分两个阶段进行方案审查。在第一阶段,多学科疾病-网站
委员会(MDC)启动和/或审查成员研究者提出的方案(当基于疾病时)
为了评估科学价值、相关患者人群的可用性、与潜在竞争药物的重叠
试验以及方案是否与疾病部位计划目标一致。MDC还协助调查人员
开展药物启动试验(IIT)。SCC的预算和运营委员会(BOC),
由临床试验办公室(CTO)和SCC行政核心的领导层组成,
确保CTO资源有效利用、业务可行性和适当性的机构协议
成本分配。在第二阶段,方案审查和监测委员会(PRMC)进行了一项
独立审查方案,以评估科学价值和设计可行性。SCC主任已
授予PRMC公开符合SCC科学价值标准的方案的机构权力
和科学优先事项,并终止不能证明科学进步的议定书。
PRMC成员包括从事癌症临床研究的多个学科的广泛代表性
research.其21名有投票权的成员是根据他们的学科知识,
设计和进行研究,和/或专门的临床专业知识。根据试验类型,
PRMC执行快速行政审查或全面委员会审查。如果是后者,至少有两个
来自PRMC投票成员的审查员被分配到方案。一项协议以多数票通过
法定人数的成员投票。在提交给机构审查委员会之前进行PRMC审查
(IRB),根据机构政策,后者在获得
PRMC。2016年,PRMC审查了114项新协议。PRMC还每年监测活动协议,
该委员会还有权关闭未显示出充分科学进展的方案。
PRMC还包括一个重点流程,旨在提高低入组试验的应计率。2016年
PRMC审查了73项活动方案的应计进度。其中,41个被批准继续,27个被
有5个项目因应计额低而关闭。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
ADAM S ASCH其他文献
ADAM S ASCH的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('ADAM S ASCH', 18)}}的其他基金
INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PLURIPOTENT-PLASTIC STATE
多能塑性状态的诱导和维持
- 批准号:
6529974 - 财政年份:2001
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PLURIPOTENT-PLASTIC STATE
多能塑性状态的诱导和维持
- 批准号:
6437203 - 财政年份:2001
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PLURIPOTENT-PLASTIC STATE
多能塑性状态的诱导和维持
- 批准号:
6643472 - 财政年份:2001
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PLURIPOTENT-PLASTIC STATE
多能塑性状态的诱导和维持
- 批准号:
6794033 - 财政年份:2001
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
Can megafauna shift the carbon and surface radiation budgets of the Arctic?
巨型动物群能否改变北极的碳和地表辐射预算?
- 批准号:
NE/W00089X/2 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Resilience of pollinators in a changing world: impact of developmental environment on metabolism and energetic budgets in social and solitary bees
不断变化的世界中授粉媒介的复原力:发育环境对群居和独居蜜蜂新陈代谢和能量预算的影响
- 批准号:
BB/X016641/1 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
An innovative EDI data, insights & peer benchmarking platform enabling global business leaders to build data-led EDI strategies, plans and budgets.
创新的 EDI 数据、见解
- 批准号:
10100319 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Collaborative R&D
Nutrient budgets as a tool for minimizing nitrogen and phosphorus losses from agricultural fields
养分预算作为最大限度减少农田氮磷损失的工具
- 批准号:
574867-2022 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
University Undergraduate Student Research Awards
Sea-ice Snow Microbial Communities’ Impact on Antarctic Bromocarbon Budgets and Processes
海冰雪微生物群落对南极溴碳预算和过程的影响
- 批准号:
2031121 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Collaborative Research: ORCC: The role of bioenergetic budgets in defining elevation limits and modeling geographic ranges of species
合作研究:ORCC:生物能预算在定义海拔限制和建模物种地理范围中的作用
- 批准号:
2222475 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Collaborative Research: ORCC: The role of bioenergetic budgets in defining elevation limits and modeling geographic ranges of species
合作研究:ORCC:生物能预算在定义海拔限制和建模物种地理范围中的作用
- 批准号:
2222476 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Continuing Grant
CNS Core: Small: Budgets, Budgets Everywhere: A Necessity for Safe Real-Time on Multicore
CNS 核心:小:预算,预算无处不在:多核安全实时的必要性
- 批准号:
2151829 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
The Effect of Aggressive Mitigation of non-CO2 Emissions on Global Carbon Budgets
积极减少非二氧化碳排放对全球碳预算的影响
- 批准号:
559571-2021 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Postgraduate Scholarships - Doctoral
Can megafauna shift the carbon and surface radiation budgets of the Arctic?
巨型动物群能否改变北极的碳和地表辐射预算?
- 批准号:
NE/W00089X/1 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 6.56万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant