Integrated Empirical and Translational Research to Diversify the Scientific Workforce
整合实证研究和转化研究,使科学队伍多样化
基本信息
- 批准号:10413809
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 71.44万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2016
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2016-04-01 至 2026-05-31
- 项目状态:未结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:AcademyAchievementAddressComplexCross-Sectional StudiesDataDecision MakingDoctor of PhilosophyElementsEmpirical ResearchEthnic groupFacultyFutureGenderGovernmentHealthIndividualInterventionInterviewInvestmentsLifeLightLong-Term EffectsLongitudinal StudiesMentorsModelingNatural SciencesParticipantPrivatizationRaceRandomized Controlled TrialsResearchSTEM fieldScienceScientistSocial SciencesStreamStudentsSubgroupTestingTimeTrainingTranslatingTranslational ResearchUnderrepresented PopulationsUnderrepresented StudentsUniversitiesWomanbasebiomedical scientistcareercollegedoctoral studentethnic diversityexperiencefluiditygender diversityimprovedinsightnovelpost-doctoral trainingprogramsprospectiveracial and ethnicracial diversityskillsstudy populationsuccesstheories
项目摘要
Summary/Abstract
The rate of diversification of the scientific workforce has been extraordinarily slow despite efforts of
thousands of individuals and large financial investments from government and private agencies over the past
4+ decades. In particular, faculty diversity in biomedical and other natural sciences has not changed to any
meaningful degree. Most research to address this problem has focused early in the pipeline, on ways to
improve retention in college STEM majors, a sense of belonging in STEM fields, and entry into PhD programs.
Modest success has been achieved in entry of students from underrepresented (UR) ethnic and racial groups,
and women into biomedical PhD training. However, these changes have not led to any real improvement in UR
or gender diversity at the faculty level. Single time, cross-sectional survey studies have shed some light on this
seemingly intractable problem, but they are limited by recall bias and lack the capacity to explain the
complexity of individuals’ experiences over time. Our research combines two research streams aiming to fully
understand experiences and career intentions of biomedical scientists: 1) through a large-scale, empirical
study beginning in 2008, “The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists,” we are following the
experiences and decision-making of a diverse group of biomedical PhD students from the start of the PhD; 2)
with translational research beginning in 2011, “The Academy for Future Science Faculty,” we implemented
a randomized controlled trial of a novel group coaching model to augment uneven mentoring and address the
isolation faced by young UR scientists. Both are prospective qualitative studies using annual, in-depth, one-on-
one interviews. We have drawn on multiple social science theories for interim analyses with sub-groups of
students. The great majority have completed the PhD; for the first time, we have revealed the great fluidity of
career intentions during training. With continuing interviews, we are poised to follow them into their careers.
The combined studies are unprecedented in their scope and duration. As of January 1, 2020, we continue
to engage 289 young scientists who have begun, or are still on a path towards, an academic career. Of this
number, 116 (40%) are UR individuals and 170 (59%) are women. Analysis of interview data has provided new
insights into the complexity of career intentions during the PhD. The next 5 years of interviews will reveal how
career intentions change during postdoctoral training; factors that influence those intentions; and, for the first
time, prospective insights on what leads to achievement and success in academic careers. The diversity of the
study population will allow detailed comparison across racial/ethnic groups and gender. Our emerging model
from the data shows how elements and integration of several social science theories will explain the lower
likelihood that individuals from UR groups will choose and persist in academic careers. With inclusion of the
Academy participants, we will be able to study the long-term effects of this novel intervention and identify
features and aspects that can be translated to student support and diversity efforts.
总结/摘要
科学劳动力多样化的速度非常缓慢,尽管作出了努力,
在过去,成千上万的个人和来自政府和私人机构的大量金融投资
4+十年。特别是,生物医学和其他自然科学的教师多样性没有任何变化,
有意义的程度。解决这一问题的大多数研究都集中在管道的早期,
提高大学STEM专业的保留率,STEM领域的归属感,以及进入博士课程。
来自代表性不足的族裔和种族群体的学生入学方面取得了一定的成功,
和妇女进入生物医学博士培训。然而,这些变化并没有给UR带来任何真实的改善
或者是教师层面的性别多样性。单次、横断面调查研究对此有一些启示
这似乎是一个棘手的问题,但他们受到回忆偏见的限制,缺乏解释的能力。
个人经历的复杂性。我们的研究结合了两个研究流,旨在充分
了解生物医学科学家的经验和职业意向:1)通过大规模的,实证的
研究开始于2008年,“年轻生命科学家的国家纵向研究”,我们正在跟踪
经验和决策的生物医学博士生从博士开始的多样化群体; 2)
随着2011年开始的转化研究,“未来科学学院”,我们实施了
一项关于一种新的小组教练模式的随机对照试验,以增加不均衡的指导,并解决
青年科学家面临的孤立。两者都是前瞻性定性研究,使用年度,深入,一对一,
一个采访。我们利用多种社会科学理论对以下小组进行中期分析:
学生绝大多数人已经完成了博士学位;这是第一次,我们揭示了巨大的流动性,
培训期间的职业意向。通过持续的采访,我们准备跟随他们进入职业生涯。
这些综合研究的范围和持续时间都是前所未有的。截至2020年1月1日,我们继续
邀请289名已经开始或仍在走向学术生涯的年轻科学家参与。本
116人(40%)是乌拉圭人,170人(59%)是妇女。对访谈数据的分析提供了新的
深入了解博士期间职业意图的复杂性。未来5年的采访将揭示如何
博士后培养过程中职业意向的变化;影响这些意向的因素;以及,首先,
时间,前瞻性的见解是什么导致成就和成功的学术生涯。的多样性
研究人群将允许在人种/种族组和性别之间进行详细比较。我们的新兴模式
从数据显示如何元素和几个社会科学理论的整合将解释较低的
来自UR群体的个人选择并坚持学术生涯的可能性。在列入
学院的参与者,我们将能够研究这种新的干预措施的长期影响,并确定
特点和方面,可以转化为学生的支持和多样性的努力。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Richard McGee其他文献
Richard McGee的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Richard McGee', 18)}}的其他基金
Integrated Empirical and Translational Research to Diversify the Scientific Workforce
整合实证研究和转化研究,使科学队伍多样化
- 批准号:
9249075 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Integrated Empirical and Translational Research to Diversify the Scientific Workforce
整合实证研究和转化研究,使科学队伍多样化
- 批准号:
9903112 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Integrated Empirical and Translational Research to Diversify the Scientific Workforce
整合实证研究和转化研究,使科学队伍多样化
- 批准号:
10657470 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
The Academy for Future Science Faculty_Diversity Through Theory Driven Coaching
未来科学学院教师_通过理论驱动的教练实现多样性
- 批准号:
8574287 - 财政年份:2013
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
The Academy for Future Science Faculty_Diversity Through Theory Driven Coaching
未来科学学院教师_通过理论驱动的教练实现多样性
- 批准号:
8688799 - 财政年份:2013
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Translating Theory to Practice to Diversify the Biomedical Research Community
将理论转化为实践,实现生物医学研究界的多元化
- 批准号:
8070158 - 财政年份:2010
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science Faculty
指导潜在女性科学教师的关键职业决策
- 批准号:
8290366 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Career Decision-Making of Future Minority Biomedical Science Faculty
未来少数族裔生物医学科学教师的职业决策
- 批准号:
7880350 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Mentoring For Success: Developing Fundamental Skills For Biomedical Research
成功指导:培养生物医学研究的基本技能
- 批准号:
7896899 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science Faculty
指导潜在女性科学教师的关键职业决策
- 批准号:
8082721 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
Collaborative Research: Using Adaptive Lessons to Enhance Motivation, Cognitive Engagement, And Achievement Through Equitable Classroom Preparation
协作研究:通过公平的课堂准备,利用适应性课程来增强动机、认知参与和成就
- 批准号:
2335802 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Collaborative Research: Using Adaptive Lessons to Enhance Motivation, Cognitive Engagement, And Achievement Through Equitable Classroom Preparation
协作研究:通过公平的课堂准备,利用适应性课程来增强动机、认知参与和成就
- 批准号:
2335801 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Participation in a Comprehensive Exercise Program and Academic Achievement
参加综合锻炼计划与学业成绩之间关系的纵向研究
- 批准号:
24K14615 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Collaborative Research: Characterizing Best Practices of Instructors who Have Narrowed Performance Gaps in Undergraduate Student Achievement in Introductory STEM Courses
合作研究:缩小本科生 STEM 入门课程成绩差距的讲师的最佳实践
- 批准号:
2420369 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Collaborative Research: Using Adaptive Lessons to Enhance Motivation, Cognitive Engagement, And Achievement Through Equitable Classroom Preparation
协作研究:通过公平的课堂准备,利用适应性课程来增强动机、认知参与和成就
- 批准号:
2335800 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
WTG: Diffusion of Research on Supporting Mathematics Achievement for Youth with Disabilities through Twitter Translational Visual Abstracts
WTG:通过 Twitter 翻译视觉摘要传播支持残疾青少年数学成就的研究
- 批准号:
2244734 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
The Impact of Emotional Experiences of Pride on Long-Term Goal Achievement Behaviors in Elite Athletes
骄傲的情感体验对优秀运动员长期目标实现行为的影响
- 批准号:
23K16740 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Meta-Analysis of the Instructional-Relational Model of Student Engagement and Math Achievement: A Moderation and Mediation Approach
学生参与度和数学成绩的教学关系模型的元分析:一种调节和中介方法
- 批准号:
2300738 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Improving maths achievement in children with speech, language, and communication needs through 'collaborative vocabulary teaching'
通过“协作词汇教学”提高有言语、语言和交流需求的儿童的数学成绩
- 批准号:
2890475 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Studentship
HSI Institutional Transformation Project: Retention and Achievement for Introductory STEM English Learners (RAISE)
HSI 机构转型项目:STEM 英语入门学习者的保留和成就 (RAISE)
- 批准号:
2225178 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 71.44万 - 项目类别:
Continuing Grant