Tracking and Evaluation Core

跟踪和评估核心

• 批准号: 10474448
• 负责人: ANGELA U SY
• 金额: $ 16.54万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2021-09-01 至 2026-07-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10474448
• 关键词: Award; Benchmarking; Biology; Biometry; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Clinical; Clinical Research; Collaborations; Colorado; Communities; Community Outreach; Consultations; Core Facility; Data; Development; Doctor of Philosophy; Effectiveness; Elements; Ensure; Evaluation; Evaluation Research; Filipino; Fostering; Funding; Goals; Grant; Hawaii; Health; Health Surveys; Healthcare Systems; Impact evaluation; Indigenous; Individual; Institutes; Institution; Intervention; Investments; Knowledge; Lead; Measures; Medical; Medical center; Mentors; Methods; Monitor; Native Hawaiian; Native-Born; Outcome; Outreach Research; Pacific Islander; Pathway Analysis; Performance; Personal Satisfaction; Persons; Physicians; Pilot Projects; Policies; Process; Productivity; Program Evaluation; Progress Reports; Public Health; Public Health Practice; Reduce health disparities; Research; Research Design; Research Infrastructure; Research Personnel; Resources; Science; Scientific Advances and Accomplishments; Scientist; Services; Social Network; Strategic Planning; System; Time; Translating; Translational Research; Universities; Ursidae Family; Washington; base; clinical application; collaborative environment; community engagement; community setting; design; distinguished professor; economic evaluation; economic impact; epidemiology study; experience; formative assessment; higher education; improved; indexing; innovation; medical schools; multidisciplinary; process evaluation; professor; programs; sound; success; tool

The purpose of the Tracking and Evaluation (TE) Core of the Center for Pacific Innovations, Knowledge, and Opportunities (PIKO) is to monitor and guide the partner institutions – the University of Hawaii (UH), Hawaii Pacific University, and Chaminade University of Honolulu (CUH) – in their efforts to improve the health of Indigenous Pacific People (IPP), defined as Native Hawaiians, Other Pacific Islanders, and Filipinos. These efforts require high‐quality, continual assessment of implementation, efficient management, and demonstrable effectiveness. PIKO TE Core incorporates a team-based approach to evaluating the efforts of the other Cores – Administrative; Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design; Professional Development; Pilot Projects Program; Community Engagement and Outreach; and Clinical Research and Regulatory Support. The TE Core is guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Program Evaluation Framework. Formative, process, outcome, and impact evaluations will be done to ensure milestones and benchmarks are achieved. This approach will also assess PIKO’s programs, resources, services, translational activities, and overall progress along the clinical and translational research (CTR) spectrum, with the ultimate goal of improving IPP health. Applied are a blend of conventional mixed-methods with selected aspects of Indigenous approaches to evaluation and innovative methods, such as social network analysis and sustainability indices, to determine the extent of change over time in health indicators. An economic evaluation will examine the return on investment of PIKO’s pilot and externally sponsored grant-related activities and outcomes. The Specific Aims of the TE Core are as follow: Specific Aim 1: Track and evaluate progress and productivity of PIKO CTR by analyzing performance data for progress reports and demonstrate sound stewardship of federal funds and by analyzing performance data for strategic planning to strengthen activities, enhance efficiency, and inform new directions. Specific Aim 2: Track and evaluate lessons learned and best practices of PIKO CTR by documenting one lesson learned for each core annually for quality improvement and by documenting one best practice for each core annually for IDeA-CTR network-wide dissemination. Specific Aim 3: Track and evaluate public health and economic impact of PIKO CTR by conducting rigorous economic analysis to ascertain ROI of core activities and conduct analysis of statewide health survey data to ascertain gains in health outcomes. The TE Core will be led by Angela Sy, DrPH, a IPP at UH experienced in evaluating research programs, assisted by Dedra Buchwald, MD, from the Washington State University, Spero Manson, PhD, from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, as consultants, and Jonathan Baker, PhD, lead evaluator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Inclusive Excellence Initiative at CUH.

太平洋创新、知识和创新中心跟踪和评估（TE）核心的目的 机会（PIKO）是监督和指导合作机构-夏威夷大学（UH），夏威夷 太平洋大学和檀香山的查米纳德大学（CUH）-在他们的努力，以改善健康的 太平洋原住民（Indigenous Pacific People，IPP），指夏威夷原住民、其他太平洋岛民和菲律宾人。这些 这些努力需要高质量、持续的实施评估、有效的管理和可证明的 有效性PIKO TE核心采用基于团队的方法来评估其他核心的工作- 管理;生物统计学、流行病学和研究设计;专业发展;试点项目 计划;社区参与和推广;和临床研究和监管支持。 TE核心由疾病控制和预防中心的计划评估框架指导。 将进行形成性、过程、结果和影响评估，以确保里程碑和基准得到遵守。 办妥了一批这种方法还将评估PIKO的计划，资源，服务，翻译活动， 沿着临床和转化研究（CTR）的整体进展，最终目标是提高 IPP健康。采用的是传统混合方法与土著方法的某些方面的混合 评估和创新方法，如社会网络分析和可持续性指数，以确定 健康指标随时间变化的程度。经济评估将审查投资回报 PIKO的试点和外部赞助的赠款相关活动和成果。TE核心的具体目标 具体如下： 具体目标1：通过分析绩效跟踪和评估PIKO CTR的进度和生产率 进度报告的数据，并通过分析绩效来展示联邦基金的良好管理 数据用于战略规划，以加强活动，提高效率，并为新方向提供信息。 具体目标2：记录并评估PIKO CTR的经验教训和最佳做法 每年从每个核心中吸取一个质量改进经验教训，并记录一个最佳做法， 每个核心每年用于IDEA-CTR网络范围内的传播。 具体目标3：跟踪和评估PIKO CTR的公共卫生和经济影响， 进行严格的经济分析，以确定核心活动的投资回报率，并对全州范围的健康调查进行分析 数据，以确定健康成果的收益。 TE核心将由Angela Sy，DrPH领导，他是UH的IPP，在评估研究项目方面经验丰富， 由华盛顿州立大学的Dedra Buchwald博士，Spero曼森博士， 科罗拉多大学安舒茨医学中心，作为顾问，和乔纳森贝克，博士，首席评估员 CUH的霍华德休斯医学研究所包容性卓越计划。