Problematising Co-production

联合制作存在问题

• 批准号: AH/J500646/1
• 负责人: Catherine Durose
• 金额: $ 4.13万
• 依托单位: De Montfort University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2011 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FJ500646%2F1
• 关键词: Problematising; Co; production

Co-production has emerged as a potential solution to a criticism that research conducted in communities often fails to meaningfully include communities in its design and undertaking. Co-production is now also perceived as a solution to an argued 'relevance gap' in research and to the demands of 'impact'. Co-production in research aims to put principles of empowerment into practice, working 'with' communities and offering communities greater control over the research process and providing opportunities to learn and reflect from their experience. Advocates for co-production argue that research is enhanced through including 'experiential expertise' (Collins and Evans 2007) which may highlight relevant questions otherwise neglected by 'experts' (Fischer 2000). Co-production can enhance the effectiveness of research by making it better informed by communities' preferences and needs, with communities then contributing to improved outcomes and achievable solutions (Ostrom 1996). This review takes a cross-cutting perspective, aiming to advance the theory and practice of co-production in research with communities.

共同制作已成为一种潜在的解决方案，以批评在社区进行的研究往往未能有意义地将社区纳入其设计和实施。联合制作现在也被认为是解决研究中存在的“相关性差距”和“影响力”需求的一种办法。研究中的共同制作旨在将赋权原则付诸实践，与社区“合作”，为社区提供对研究过程的更大控制权，并提供学习和反思经验的机会。联合制作的倡导者认为，通过纳入“经验性专业知识”（柯林斯和埃文斯，2007年）可以增强研究，这可能会突出被“专家”忽视的相关问题（费舍尔，2000年）。共同制作可以提高研究的有效性，使研究更好地了解社区的偏好和需要，然后社区为改进成果和可实现的解决办法作出贡献（Ostrom 1996年）。本文从跨学科的角度对社区合作研究的理论与实践进行了综述。

项目成果

Designing Public Policy For Co-Production - Theory, practice and change

设计联合生产的公共政策 - 理论、实践和变革

• DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447316695.003.0013
• 发表时间: 2015
• 作者: Jones P

Towards Co-Production of Research with Communities

与社区共同开展研究

• 发表时间: 2012
• 作者: Durose, C.

Illuminating the Evolution of Community Participation

阐明社区参与的演变

• 发表时间: 2012
• 作者: Durose, C.

Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers' Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation?

将研究的靴子放在政策制定者的脚上：参与式方法能否改变政策制定者与评估之间的关系？

• DOI: 10.1111/spol.12031
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: Social Policy & Administration
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Richardson L