The Politics of Judicial Independence: Follow on Funding

司法独立的政治:后续资金

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    AH/L007363/1
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    英国
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助国家:
    英国
  • 起止时间:
    2014 至 无数据
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

This proposal is for follow up funding for the research project on "The Politics of Judicial Independence" (2011-13), which finishes in December 2013. The project explored the changing relations between the judiciary, executive and Parliament in light of recent constitutional reforms which established the judiciary as a more separate branch of government. Throughout the project the research team held private seminars with representatives from all three branches of government and the legal profession, to stimulate dialogue between them. They now want to take their findings out to a wider audience, by organising a series of lectures, seminars and conferences to disseminate their findings to different practitioner communities through 2014. To help engage with new audiences, many of these follow-up activities involve working with partner organisations. Promoting dialogue with non-lawyers- To take the discussion out to wider groups in politics and civil society, three seminars will be organised with different think tanks: the Centre for Policy Studies (Conservative leaning), CentreForum (Lib Dem) and the Fabian Society (Labour). Promoting dialogue with the three branches of government- For judges and lawyers, events will be held in the Supreme Court, Middle Temple, Judicial College and the Administrative Law Bar Association. For Parliamentarians, events will be organised with the All Party Parliamentary Group on the Constitution, and the Parliament and Constitution Centre in the Commons Library. For Whitehall, there will be seminars in the Ministry of Justice, Judicial Appointments Commission and Institute for Government. Closing Conference- These follow up events will conclude with a big public conference in autumn 2014 to round off the programme. It will involve the key participants of the last 10 years (Lord Woolf, Lord Judge, Jack Straw), and address the key questions raised during the public discussions: have the judiciary become too powerful? Are the judges sufficiently accountable? etc.Dissemination in the media - The research team will promote all these events, and wider discussions through their web pages, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.Archival Interviews with former Lord Chancellors and Lord Chief Justices- The researchers have talked to most of the five former Lord Chancellors and three Lord Chief Justices. They now plan to record proper TV quality interviews with each of them to create a historical archive. These would form an important historical record. The Lord Chancellors and Lord Chief Justices have been the leading actors in the recent constitutional changes, but for judicial reasons they have been reticent about their role.
该提案是为2013年12月结束的“司法独立的政治”研究项目(2011- 2013年)提供后续资金。该项目根据最近的宪法改革探讨了司法、行政和议会之间不断变化的关系,这些改革将司法确立为政府的一个更加独立的分支。在整个项目过程中,研究小组与政府所有三个部门和法律的专业的代表举行了私人研讨会,以促进他们之间的对话。他们现在希望通过组织一系列讲座、研讨会和会议,将他们的发现传播给更广泛的受众,直到2014年。为了帮助吸引新的受众,许多后续活动涉及与伙伴组织合作。促进与非律师的对话-为了将讨论扩大到政治和民间社会的更广泛群体,将与不同的智囊团组织三次研讨会:政策研究中心(倾向于保守党)、中心论坛(自由民主党)和费边社(工党)。促进与政府三大部门的对话-将在最高法院、中殿法院、司法学院和行政法律师协会为法官和律师举办活动。对于议会议员,将与所有政党的宪法议会小组以及下议院图书馆的议会和宪法中心一起组织活动。对于白厅,将在司法部、司法鉴定委员会和政府研究所举办研讨会。闭幕会议-这些后续活动将在2014年秋季举行一次大型公开会议,以圆满结束该计划。它将涉及过去10年的主要参与者(伍尔夫勋爵、法官勋爵、杰克·斯特劳),并解决公众讨论中提出的关键问题:司法机构是否变得过于强大?法官有足够的责任心吗?媒体传播-研究小组将通过他们的网页、YouTube、Facebook和Twitter推广所有这些活动,并进行更广泛的讨论。与前大法官和首席大法官的档案访谈-研究人员与五位前大法官和三位首席大法官中的大多数进行了交谈。他们现在计划记录适当的电视质量采访他们每个人创建一个历史档案。这将是一个重要的历史记录。在最近的宪法改革中,大法官和大法官一直是主要角色,但出于司法原因,他们对自己的作用保持沉默。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(7)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Judicial independence and accountability in the UK have both emerged stronger as a result of the Constitutional Reform Act 2015
2015 年《宪法改革法案》的实施使英国的司法独立性和问责制都得到了加强
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2015
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Hazell R J D
  • 通讯作者:
    Hazell R J D
With greater separation of powers, how much more power do British judges have?
随着权力的进一步分立,英国法官的权力增加了多少?
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Robert Hazell (Author)
  • 通讯作者:
    Robert Hazell (Author)
Regulating Judges - Beyond Independence and Accountability
规范法官——超越独立性和问责制
  • DOI:
    10.4337/9781786430793.00013
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Gee G
  • 通讯作者:
    Gee G
Meaningful Dialogue: Judicial Engagement with Parliamentary Committees at Westminster
有意义的对话:与威斯敏斯特议会委员会的司法接触
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Hazell R J D
  • 通讯作者:
    Hazell R J D
AlanPaterson, Final Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court, Oxford: Hart, 2013, xxx + 335 pp, £25.00.
艾伦帕特森,《最终判决:最后的上议院法官和最高法院》,牛津:哈特,2013 年,xxx 335 页,25.00 英镑。
  • DOI:
    10.1111/1468-2230.12112_2
  • 发表时间:
    2015
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Gee G
  • 通讯作者:
    Gee G
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Robert Hazell其他文献

Robert Hazell的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Robert Hazell', 18)}}的其他基金

The Politics of Judicial Independence in Britain's Changing Constitution
英国不断变化的宪法中的司法独立政治
  • 批准号:
    AH/H039554/1
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Evaluating the impact of freedom of Information upon local government in England
评估信息自由对英格兰地方政府的影响
  • 批准号:
    ES/G027641/1
  • 财政年份:
    2009
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Evaluating the impact of freedom of information in the UK
评估英国信息自由的影响
  • 批准号:
    ES/E003591/1
  • 财政年份:
    2007
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Devolution Monitoring Reports 2005-2008
2005-2008 年权力下放监测报告
  • 批准号:
    RES-219-25-2006
  • 财政年份:
    2006
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant

相似海外基金

Conference: Judicial Independence and Rule of Law Across the Globe
会议:全球司法独立与法治
  • 批准号:
    2227624
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Judicial independence in authoritarian and hybrid regimes
独裁和混合政权中的司法独立
  • 批准号:
    ES/W007223/1
  • 财政年份:
    2021
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Designing Judicial Selection Systems through Modern Challenges in Japan and the United States: Judicial Independence and Democracy
通过日本和美国的现代挑战设计司法选拔制度:司法独立与民主
  • 批准号:
    18K12618
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Judicial Independence and Interbranch Conflict in the American States
美洲各州的司法独立与部门间冲突
  • 批准号:
    1654934
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
An Analysis of the Independence of Judicial Powers in the military in Pre-war Japan with Special Reference to Judge Advocates (Homukan)
战前日本军队司法权独立性分析,特别是辩护律师(Homukan)
  • 批准号:
    15K03293
  • 财政年份:
    2015
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
The Institutional Foundations of Judicial Independence
司法独立的制度基础
  • 批准号:
    1424013
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
WORKSHOP: Constitutional Rights, Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy; November 13-16, 2014, -New York Law School
研讨会:宪法权利、司法独立和向民主过渡;
  • 批准号:
    1423564
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
A Study on the Correlation between Impartiality and Independence in Judicial Remedial Processes
司法救济过程中公正性与独立性的相关性研究
  • 批准号:
    25870506
  • 财政年份:
    2013
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
The Politics of Judicial Independence in Britain's Changing Constitution
英国不断变化的宪法中的司法独立政治
  • 批准号:
    AH/H039554/1
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Pursuing the Judicial Election Reform in the United States : Judicial Independence, Impartiality, and the Public Confidence in the Courts
推行美国司法选举改革:司法独立、公正和公众对法院的信任
  • 批准号:
    22730010
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 资助金额:
    $ 3.58万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了