权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

History of Analytic Philosophy International Network (HAPINet)

分析哲学史国际网络（HAPINet）

基本信息

批准号：
AH/L015773/1
负责人：
Michael Beaney
金额：
$ 4.5万
依托单位：
University of York
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2014 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FL015773%2F1
关键词：
History Analytic Philosophy International Network

项目摘要

Analytic philosophy is generally regarded as one of the leading philosophical traditions in the English-speaking world, and it has also been growing in the rest of the world, most notably, over the last decade or so, in mainland China, following its earlier establishment in Taiwan. It is the main aim of this proposed network to investigate the historical and philosophical significance of these developments by comparing the history of analytic philosophy in China and Taiwan with its history in the West.Analytic philosophy in the West originated in the advances in logic that took place in the last two decades of the nineteenth century. Around this time, too, China began to open up to Western influence, and terms from Western logic were translated into Chinese, inspiring not only work on logic in China but also interest in the logical aspects of traditional Chinese philosophy. A Chinese tradition of logic came to be constructed, and debates took place concerning the relationship between Chinese logic and Western and Indian logic. The Japanese invasion of China in 1937, the Second World War, the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, and then especially the Cultural Revolution between 1966 and 1976, hindered the further development of dialogue with the West; but in the last two decades mainland China has increasingly opened up, with Western philosophers being invited to teach and speak at conferences in China, and more and more translations of key Western texts being undertaken.In the English-speaking world, and especially in analytic philosophy, translation is all too often taken for granted, yet the translation of philosophical texts not only requires philosophical skills but also raises philosophical questions that are easily overlooked if working in just one language. One of the aims of the present project is to identify and explore precisely these questions. For example, basic terms concerning meaning (e.g. 'content', 'sense', 'reference', 'denotation', etc.) can be very usefully investigated by considering how they might be translated into different languages; and their translation into Chinese raises particular difficulties due to the different nature and structure of the Chinese language and the different culture in which that language has developed. Exploring the ways that basic terms of analytic philosophy have been - and are being - translated into Chinese can thus throw much light on the most fundamental ideas and implicit assumptions of analytic philosophy.Four workshops/conferences are planned: two to be held in York (summer 2014 and spring 2015) and two to be held in Beijing (autumn 2014 and autumn 2015). These will bring together analytic philosophers and historians of analytic philosophy in the West (especially in the UK) and in China (both mainland China and Taiwan). One workshop, in particular, will bring together the translators of The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (edited by Michael Beaney and published in 2013), which is currently being translated into Chinese under the directorship of Prof. Jiang Yi of Beijing Normal University, supported by a grant from the Chinese government. Some of the original contributors to the Handbook will be invited to Beijing to explore with the translators some of the key philosophical issues that have arisen in undertaking this translation.The project will be managed by a committee made up of the PI, Ci and representatives from other universities in Beijing, Taipei and the UK. The management committee will meet at each of the workshops and conferences. The project has the firm support from philosophers and universities in both Beijing and Taipei.

分析哲学在英语世界被普遍认为是最重要的哲学传统之一，它在世界其他地区也得到了发展，最值得注意的是，在过去十多年中，中国大陆继台湾之后。本文的主要目的是通过比较中国大陆和台湾的分析哲学史与西方的分析哲学史来考察这些发展的历史和哲学意义。西方的分析哲学起源于世纪最后20年逻辑学的进步。大约在这个时候，中国开始向西方开放，西方逻辑的术语被翻译成中文，不仅激发了中国逻辑的工作，而且也激发了对中国传统哲学逻辑方面的兴趣。中国逻辑的传统开始建立，中国逻辑与西方和印度逻辑的关系发生了争论。1937年日本侵华、第二次世界大战、1949年中华人民共和国的成立，特别是1966年至1976年的文化大革命，阻碍了与西方对话的进一步发展;但在过去的二十年里，中国大陆越来越开放，西方哲学家被邀请到中国授课和在会议上发言，在英语世界，尤其是在分析哲学领域，翻译往往被视为理所当然的事情，然而，哲学文本的翻译不仅需要哲学技巧，而且还提出了一些哲学问题，如果只使用一种语言，这些问题很容易被忽视。本项目的目标之一就是准确地确定和探讨这些问题。例如，涉及意义的基本术语（例如，“内容”、“意义”、“指称”、“外延”等）通过考虑如何将它们翻译成不同的语言，可以非常有用地进行研究;由于中国语言的不同性质和结构以及这种语言发展的不同文化，它们翻译成中文带来了特别的困难。因此，探索分析哲学的基本术语已经--以及正在--翻译成中文的方式，可以对分析哲学最基本的思想和隐含的假设提供更多的启示。计划举办四次研讨会/会议：两次将在约克举行（2014年夏和2015年春），两次将在北京举行（2014年秋和2015年秋）。这将汇集西方（特别是英国）和中国（包括中国大陆和台湾）的分析哲学家和分析哲学史学家。其中一个研讨会将汇集《牛津分析哲学史手册》（由Michael Beaney编辑，2013年出版）的译者，该手册目前正在北京师范大学姜毅教授的指导下翻译成中文，并得到中国政府的资助。该手册的一些原始贡献者将被邀请到北京，与译者一起探讨翻译过程中出现的一些关键哲学问题。该项目将由PI、CI和其他代表组成的委员会管理北京、台北和英国的大学。管理委员会将在每次讲习班和会议上开会。该项目得到了北京和台北的哲学家和大学的坚定支持。